Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33804691›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Understanding How to Improve the Use of Clinical Coordination Mechanisms between Primary and Secondary Care Doctors: Clues from Catalonia.

Laura Esteve-Matalí, Ingrid Vargas, Franco Amigo, Pere Plaja, Francesc Cots, Erick F Mayer, Joan-Manuel Pérez-Castejón, María-Luisa Vázquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura Esteve-MatalíHealth Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6561-0131
Ingrid VargasHealth Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1778-2411
Franco AmigoHealth Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3602-5168
Pere PlajaFundació Salut Empordà, 17600 Figueres, Spain.
Francesc CotsParc de Salut Mar, 08019 Barcelona, Spain.
Erick F MayerServeis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà, 17230 Palamós, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9514-8670
Joan-Manuel Pérez-CastejónBadalona Serveis Assistencials, 08911 Badalona, Spain.
María-Luisa VázquezHealth Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6091-8193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical coordination between primary (PC) and secondary care (SC) is a challenge for health systems, and clinical coordination mechanisms (CCM) play an important role in the interface between care levels. It is therefore essential to understand the elements that may hinder their use. This study aims to analyze the level of use of CCM, the difficulties and factors associated with their use, and suggestions for improving clinical coordination. A cross-sectional online survey-based study using the questionnaire COORDENA-CAT was conducted with 3308 PC and SC doctors in the Catalan national health system. Descriptive bivariate analysis and logistic regression models were used. Shared Electronic Medical Records were the most frequently used CCM, especially by PC doctors, and the one that presented most difficulties in use, mostly related to technical problems. Some factors positively associated with frequent use of various CCM were: working full-time in integrated areas, or with local hospitals. Interactional and organizational factors contributed to a greater extent among SC doctors. Suggestions for improving clinical coordination were similar between care levels and related mainly to the improvement of CCM. In an era where management tools are shifting towards technology-based CCM, this study can help to design strategies to improve their effectiveness.

Indexed as

PhysiciansSecondary Health CareCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrimary Health CareSpainclinical coordinationcoordination mechanismselectronic medical recordhealth services researchprimary carequestionnaireremote consultationsecondary care

Identifiers

PMID33804691
PMCPMC8003988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.