Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33804562›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Generalizability of Deep Learning Models for Caries Detection in Near-Infrared Light Transillumination Images.

Agnes Holtkamp, Karim Elhennawy, José E Cejudo Grano de Oro, Joachim Krois, Sebastian Paris, Falk Schwendicke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agnes HoltkampDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Karim ElhennawyDepartment of Orthodontics, Dentofacial Orthopedics and Pedodontics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
José E Cejudo Grano de OroDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Joachim KroisDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6010-8940
Sebastian ParisDepartment of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Falk SchwendickeDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1223-1669
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KR 5457/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present study aimed to train deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to detect caries lesions on Near-Infrared Light Transillumination (NILT) imagery obtained either in vitro or in vivo and to assess the models' generalizability.

methodsIn vitro, 226 extracted posterior permanent human teeth were mounted in a diagnostic model in a dummy head. Then, NILT images were generated (DIAGNOcam, KaVo, Biberach), and images were segmented tooth-wise. In vivo, 1319 teeth from 56 patients were obtained and segmented similarly. Proximal caries lesions were annotated pixel-wise by three experienced dentists, reviewed by a fourth dentist, and then transformed into binary labels. We trained ResNet classification models on both in vivo and in vitro datasets and used 10-fold cross-validation for estimating the performance and generalizability of the models. We used GradCAM to increase explainability.

resultsThe tooth-level prevalence of caries lesions was 41% in vitro and 49% in vivo, respectively. Models trained and tested on in vivo data performed significantly better (mean ± SD accuracy: 0.78 ± 0.04) than those trained and tested on in vitro data (accuracy: 0.64 ± 0.15;

conclusionsUsing in vitro setups for generating NILT imagery and training CNNs comes with low accuracy and generalizability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Studies employing in vitro imagery for developing deep learning models should be critically appraised for their generalizability. Applicable deep learning models for assessing NILT imagery should be trained on in vivo data.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecariesdiagnosticsdigital imaging/radiologymathematical modeling

Identifiers

PMID33804562
PMCPMC7957685
OpenAlexW3134474325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.