ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Generalizability of Deep Learning Models for Caries Detection in Near-Infrared Light Transillumination Images.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explainability, Bias and Generalizability of AI Models in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of Model Interpretability and Equity.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for binary dental caries diagnosis using intraoral images and dental radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Caries lesions diagnosis with deep convolutional neural network in intraoral QLF images by handheld device.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Simultaneous detection of dental caries and fissure sealant in intraoral photos by deep learning: a pilot study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Lesion Detection in Optical Coherence Tomography with Transformer-Enhanced Detector.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Dentistry E-Health.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Exploring the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Healthcare: A Multidisciplinary Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Analysis of Deep Learning Techniques for Dental Informatics: A Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe present study aimed to train deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to detect caries lesions on Near-Infrared Light Transillumination (NILT) imagery obtained either in vitro or in vivo and to assess the models' generalizability.
methodsIn vitro, 226 extracted posterior permanent human teeth were mounted in a diagnostic model in a dummy head. Then, NILT images were generated (DIAGNOcam, KaVo, Biberach), and images were segmented tooth-wise. In vivo, 1319 teeth from 56 patients were obtained and segmented similarly. Proximal caries lesions were annotated pixel-wise by three experienced dentists, reviewed by a fourth dentist, and then transformed into binary labels. We trained ResNet classification models on both in vivo and in vitro datasets and used 10-fold cross-validation for estimating the performance and generalizability of the models. We used GradCAM to increase explainability.
resultsThe tooth-level prevalence of caries lesions was 41% in vitro and 49% in vivo, respectively. Models trained and tested on in vivo data performed significantly better (mean ± SD accuracy: 0.78 ± 0.04) than those trained and tested on in vitro data (accuracy: 0.64 ± 0.15;
conclusionsUsing in vitro setups for generating NILT imagery and training CNNs comes with low accuracy and generalizability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Studies employing in vitro imagery for developing deep learning models should be critically appraised for their generalizability. Applicable deep learning models for assessing NILT imagery should be trained on in vivo data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.