ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
The Efficacy of Cone-Beam CT-Based Perfusion Mapping in Evaluation of Tissue Perfusion in Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Angiography Protocol Optimization in Peripheral and Visceral Interventions.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
- Incoherent Optical Fluctuation Flowmetry: A New Method for the Assessment of Foot Perfusion in Patients with Diabetes-Related Lower-Extremity Complications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Impact of Lower Extremity Skeletal Muscle Atrophy and Myosteatosis on Revascularization Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based perfusion mapping during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) to predict clinical outcome in the peripheral arterial disease (PAD). From January 2016 to March 2020, 43 patients (28 male, 15 female; mean age, 69) with 51 limbs, who underwent PTA with CBCT-based foot perfusion mapping for PAD were included. Parenchymal blood volume (PBV) of foot was measured. Clinical response was investigated based on medical records. Predictive value for clinical success was evaluated using multiple logistic regression with C-statistics. Two reviewers visually assessed the improvement on angiography and CBCT-based foot perfusion mapping; inter-observer agreement of clinical success between the two were measured. Technical and clinical success rate of PTA was 90.8% and 68.6%, respectively. In multiple logistic regression, the maximum value of PBV (PBV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.