Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33804367›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Discordance between Body-Mass Index and Body Adiposity Index in the Classification of Weight Status of Elderly Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Bartosz Hudzik, Justyna Nowak, Janusz Szkodzinski, Aleksander Danikiewicz, Ilona Korzonek-Szlacheta, Barbara Zubelewicz-Szkodzińska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Insulin and cancer: a tangled web.The Biochemical journal · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bartosz HudzikDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Department of Metabolic Disease Prevention, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 41-900 Bytom, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3880-5325
Justyna NowakDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Department of Metabolic Disease Prevention, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 41-900 Bytom, Poland.
Janusz SzkodzinskiThird Department of Cardiology, Silesian Center for Heart Disease, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.
Aleksander DanikiewiczDepartment of Nutrition-Related Disease Prevention, Department of Metabolic Disease Prevention, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 41-900 Bytom, Poland.
Ilona Korzonek-SzlachetaDepartment of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Department of Metabolic Disease Prevention, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 41-900 Bytom, Poland.
Barbara Zubelewicz-SzkodzińskaDepartment of Nutrition-Related Disease Prevention, Department of Metabolic Disease Prevention, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 41-900 Bytom, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

Medical University of Silesia K-NW-8/21-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsBody-mass index (BMI) is a popular method implemented to define weight status. However, describing obesity by BMI may result in inaccurate assessment of adiposity. The Body Adiposity Index (BAI) is intended to be a directly validated method of estimating body fat percentage. We set out to compare body weight status assessment by BMI and BAI in a cohort of elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

methodsA total of 169 patients with stable CAD were enrolled in an out-patient cardiology clinic. The National Research Council (US) Committee on Diet and Health classification was used for individuals older than 65 years as underweight BMI < 24 kg/m

resultsOnly 72 out of 169 patients (42.6%) had concordant classification of weight status by both BMI and BAI. The majority of the patients had their weight status either underestimated or overestimated. There were strong positive correlations between BMI and BImpA (FAT%) (R = 0.78

conclusionsThere is substantial rate of misclassification of weight status between BMI and BAI. These findings have significant implications for clinical practice as the boundary between health and disease in malnutrition is crucial to accurately define criteria for intervention. Perhaps BMI cut-offs for classifying weight status in the elderly should be revisited.

Indexed as

body adiposity indexbody-mass indexcoronary artery diseasediscordanceelderlyweight status classification

Identifiers

PMID33804367
PMCPMC7957704
OpenAlexW3133582070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.