Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33804298›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Age and Overweight Are Not Contraindications for a Breast Reconstruction with a TMG-Flap-A Risk and Complication Analysis of a Retrospective Double Center Study Including 300 Patients.

Karl Schwaiger, Laurenz Weitgasser, Maximilian Mahrhofer, Kathrin Bachleitner, Selim Abed, Julia Wimbauer, Elisabeth Russe, Thomas Schoeller, Gottfried Wechselberger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Age and Breast Reconstruction.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karl SchwaigerDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God (Barmherzige Brüder), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4355-1318
Laurenz WeitgasserDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Teaching Hospital of the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Maximilian MahrhoferDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Teaching Hospital of the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1635-1502
Kathrin BachleitnerDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Teaching Hospital of the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Selim AbedDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God (Barmherzige Brüder), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Julia WimbauerDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God (Barmherzige Brüder), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Elisabeth RusseDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God (Barmherzige Brüder), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Thomas SchoellerDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Teaching Hospital of the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Gottfried WechselbergerDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God (Barmherzige Brüder), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATMarienhospital Stuttgart · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap has become a popular and reliable alternative for autologous breast reconstruction. Initially described as a valuable tissue source for women with low body-mass index, indications nowadays have widely expanded. The Western civilization demographic development with its aging population and the steady growing average BMI has led to increasing breast reconstructions with TMG flaps in overweight and aged individuals. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 300 TMG free flaps for unilateral autologous breast reconstruction were evaluated in the form of a retrospective double center cohort study. Data extraction, study group formation and statistical analysis (One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson's chi-squared statistical analysis and relative risk calculation) were done specifically to evaluate age and BMI as risk factors for postoperative complications and outcome.

resultsNo significant differences in patients' age and BMI in the complication groups compared to the no-complication group could be found. No significant difference regarding the occurrence of complications could be found in any of the formed risk-groups. No significant increase of minor-, major- or overall complications, flap loss or revision surgeries were found in the elderly patient groups or for patients with overweight.

conclusionAge and overweight do not significantly increase the risk for postoperative complications after breast reconstructions with free TMG flaps. The findings of this study support the fact that microsurgical breast reconstruction with a free TMG flap should not solely be reserved for younger patients and females with a lower BMI.

Indexed as

autologous breast reconstructionbreast reconstructioncomplication analysisTMG flaptransverse myocutaneous gracilis flaptransverse upper gracilis flap

Identifiers

PMID33804298
PMCPMC7957526
OpenAlexW3135435128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.