SynthesisMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2021
Current Status of the Self-Expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery Versus Emergency Surgery in Colorectal Cancer: Results from an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.
Synthesis in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colonic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery Versus Emergency Resection in Obstructive Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diversion ostomy improves treatment tolerance, conversion surgery, and survival compared with self-expanding metal stenting in initially unresectable obstructive colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of endoscopic stent in curative and palliative management of malignant colonic obstruction: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- After stent placement in patient with left colon cancer with intestinal obstruction safety and efficacy analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of a novel-covered colonic stent in obstructive colon cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Observational
- Danish guidelines for treating acute colonic obstruction caused by colorectal cancer-a review.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- Stent as bridge to surgery decreases postoperative complications without worsening oncological outcomes: retrospective unicentric cohort study and stent placement protocol.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- 5-year oncological outcomes in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: stent as bridge to surgery.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: Is there a role for endoscopic stenting?World journal of clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Oncologic impact of colonic stents for obstructive left-sided colon cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Colonic stent for bridge to surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A review of the literature after 2020.World journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Oncologic safety of colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: Current evidence and prospects.World journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of interval colectomy performed by acute care surgeons after stenting as a bridge to surgery for left-sided malignant colonic obstruction are non-inferior to the outcomes of colorectal surgeons in the elective setting: single center experience.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022Article
- Effect of self-expandable metal stent on morbidity and mortality and oncological prognosis in malignant colonic obstruction: retrospective analysis of its use as curative and palliative treatment.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Article
- Case report: Stent-first strategy as a potential approach in the management of malignant right-sided colonic obstruction with cardiovascular risks.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.