ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Novel End-To-End Feature Selection and Diagnosis Method for Rotating Machinery.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feature selection is to obtain effective features from data, also known as feature engineering. Traditional feature selection and predictive model learning are separated, and there is a problem of inconsistency of criteria. This paper presents an end-to-end feature selection and diagnosis method that organically unifies feature expression learning and machine prediction learning into one model. The algorithm first combines the prediction model to calculate the mean impact value (MIVs) of the feature and realizes primary feature selection for the prediction model by selecting the feature with a larger MIV. In order to take into account the performance of the feature itself, the within-class and between-class discriminant analysis (WBDA) method is proposed, and combined with the feature diversity strategy, the feature-oriented secondary selection is realized. Eventually, feature vectors obtained by two selections are classified using a multi-class support vector machine (SVM). Compared with the modified network variable selection algorithm (MIVs), the principal component analysis dimensionality reduction algorithm (PCA), variable selection based on compensative distance evaluation technology (CDET), and other algorithms, the proposed method MIVs-WBDA exhibits excellent classification accuracy owing to the fusion of feature selection and predictive model learning. According to the results of classification accuracy testing after dimensionality reduction on rotating machinery status, the MIVs-WBDA method has a 3% classification accuracy improvement under the low-dimensional feature set. The typical running time of this classification learning algorithm is less than 10 s, while using deep learning, its running time will be more than a few hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.