Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33803930›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Possible Advantages of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in the Treatment of Septic Osteoarthritis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint in the Diabetic Foot.

Matevž Kastrin, Vilma Urbančič Rovan, Igor Frangež

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06388603 (A National, Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Comparison of Bioactive Glass S53P4 Versus Standard of Care Treatment of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis in the Forefoot), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06388603 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A National, Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Comparison of Bioactive Glass S53P4 Versus Standard of Care Treatment of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis in the Forefoot

TypeinterventionalSponsorASST Ovest MilaneseRan2024 to 2026Enrolled140ConditionsOsteomyelitis - FootArmsBioactive Glass, Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matevž KastrinDepartment of Surgical Infections, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vilma Urbančič RovanDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8599-5355
Igor FrangežDepartment of Surgical Infections, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-9963-8810
University of Ljubljana · SILjubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomechanically, the great toe with its metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint plays a key role in standing and walking, making the first MTP joint one of the main predilection sites for ulcer formation, and consequently for bone and joint infection and even amputation. If conservative treatment fails, the main goal of surgery is to remove all infected tissue and preserve the first ray. To improve surgical outcomes, development of new biomaterials like Bioactive Glass S53P4 has begun. Bioactive Glass is useful because of its antibacterial properties; furthermore, its osteostimulative and osteoconductive qualities make the bone substitute particularly suitable as a bone defect filler for the treatment of osteomyelitis. The aim of our retrospective observational study was to compare the outcomes following ulcerectomy with segmental resection of the infected joint and bone and temporary stabilization with an external fixator, both with and without added Bioactive Glass. A comparison of added Bioactive Glass with the traditional surgical treatment in septic osteoarthritis of the first MTP joint showed Bioactive Glass to be effective. During a one-year follow-up, patients with Bioactive Glass required no additional antibiotic therapy or surgical intervention. Bioactive Glass, when applied to the diabetic foot, showed itself to be a safe bone substitute biomaterial.

Indexed as

bioactive glassdiabetic footdiabetic foot osteomyelitisfoot ulcersegmental resection of the first MTP jointseptic osteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID33803930
PMCPMC8000728
OpenAlexW3138790843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.