Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33803820›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

Adaptive Divergence under Gene Flow along an Environmental Gradient in Two Coexisting Stickleback Species.

Thijs M P Bal, Alejandro Llanos-Garrido, Anurag Chaturvedi, Io Verdonck, Bart Hellemans, Joost A M Raeymaekers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Thijs M P BalFaculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, N-8049 Bodø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7036-2651
Alejandro Llanos-GarridoDepartment of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6307-1971
Anurag ChaturvediDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore Building, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9586-544X
Io VerdonckLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Bart HellemansLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5963-8074
Joost A M RaeymaekersFaculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, N-8049 Bodø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2732-7495
KU Leuven · BENord University · NOHarvard University · USUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a general and solid theoretical framework to explain how the interplay between natural selection and gene flow affects local adaptation. Yet, to what extent coexisting closely related species evolve collectively or show distinctive evolutionary responses remains a fundamental question. To address this, we studied the population genetic structure and morphological differentiation of sympatric three-spined and nine-spined stickleback. We conducted genotyping-by-sequencing and morphological trait characterisation using 24 individuals of each species from four lowland brackish water (LBW), four lowland freshwater (LFW) and three upland freshwater (UFW) sites in Belgium and the Netherlands. This combination of sites allowed us to contrast populations from isolated but environmentally similar locations (LFW vs. UFW), isolated but environmentally heterogeneous locations (LBW vs. UFW), and well-connected but environmentally heterogenous locations (LBW vs. LFW). Overall, both species showed comparable levels of genetic diversity and neutral genetic differentiation. However, for all three spatial scales, signatures of morphological and genomic adaptive divergence were substantially stronger among populations of the three-spined stickleback than among populations of the nine-spined stickleback. Furthermore, most outlier SNPs in the two species were associated with local freshwater sites. The few outlier SNPs that were associated with the split between brackish water and freshwater populations were located on one linkage group in three-spined stickleback and two linkage groups in nine-spined stickleback. We conclude that while both species show congruent evolutionary and genomic patterns of divergent selection, both species differ in the magnitude of their response to selection regardless of the geographical and environmental context.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBelgiumGene FlowGenotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNetherlandsOrganic ChemicalsSequence Analysis, DNASmegmamorphaOrganic ChemicalsPhen Green SKlandscape genomicslocal adaptationnine-spined sticklebackpopulation geneticsspecies-specific propertiesthree-spined stickleback

Identifiers

PMID33803820
PMCPMC8003309
OpenAlexW3137060227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.