Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33803781›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Testing the Functional Model of Bone Development: Direct and Mediating Role of Muscle Strength on Bone Properties in Growing Youth.

Izabella A Ludwa, Kevin Mongeon, Malcolm Sanderson, Luis Gracia Marco, Panagiota Klentrou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Special Issue on Health, Physical Activity, and Performance in Youth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Izabella A LudwaCentre for Bone and Muscle Health, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2308-6586
Kevin MongeonFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Malcolm SandersonDepartment of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.
Luis Gracia MarcoDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, PROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4020-0256
Panagiota KlentrouCentre for Bone and Muscle Health, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0328-5198
Brock University · CAUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

CIHR 199944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the functional model of bone development in peri-pubertal boys and girls. Specifically, we implemented a mixed-longitudinal design and hierarchical structural models to provide experimental evidence in support of the conceptual functional model of bone development, postulating that the primary mechanical stimulus of bone strength development is muscle force. To this end, we measured radial and tibial bone properties (speed of sound, SOS), isometric grip and knee extensors strength, bone resorption (urinary NTX concentration), body mass index (BMI), somatic maturity (years from peak height velocity) and skeletal maturity (bone age) in 180 children aged 8-16 years. Measurements were repeated 2-4 times over a period of 3 years. The multilevel structural equation modeling of 406 participant-session observations revealed similar results for radial and tibial SOS. Muscle strength (i.e., grip strength for the radial and knee extension for tibial model) and NTX have a significant direct effect on bone SOS (β = 0.29 and -0.18, respectively). Somatic maturity had a direct impact on muscle strength (β = 0.24) and both a direct and indirect effect on bone SOS (total effect, β = 0.30). Physical activity and BMI also had a significant direct impact on bone properties, (β = 0.06 and -0.18, respectively), and an additional significant indirect effect through muscle strength (β = 0.01 and 0.05, respectively) with small differences per bone site and sex. Muscle strength fully mediated the impact of bone age (β = 0.14) while there was no significant effect of energy intake on either muscle strength or bone SOS. In conclusion, our results support the functional model of bone development in that muscle strength and bone metabolism directly affect bone development while the contribution of maturity, physical activity, and other modulators such as BMI, on bone development is additionally modulated through their effect on muscle strength.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesMuscle StrengthAdolescentBone DensityBone DevelopmentChildFemaleHumansMaleRadiusTibiaUltrasonographybone developmentbone turnoverchildrenmuscle strengthradial speed of soundtibial speed of sound

Identifiers

PMID33803781
PMCPMC8003175
OpenAlexW3139156869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.