ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Mechanism Integrated Information.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrinsic units: identifying a system's causal grain.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- Integrated information theory (IIT) and the testability of the silent neuron predictions.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- Beyond mimicry: a framework for evaluating genuine intelligence in artificial systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Upper bounds for integrated information.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A synergistic workspace for human consciousness revealed by Integrated Information Decomposition.eLife · 2024Article
- (Dis)confirming theories of consciousness and their predictions: towards a Lakatosian consciousness science.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2024Article
- The Fundamental Tension in Integrated Information Theory 4.0's Realist Idealism.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Integrated information theory (IIT) 4.0: Formulating the properties of phenomenal existence in physical terms.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- An implementation of integrated information theory in resting-state fMRI.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Computing the Integrated Information of a Quantum Mechanism.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- System Integrated Information.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fusions of Consciousness.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Don't forget the boundary problem! How EM field topology can address the overlooked cousin to the binding problem for consciousness.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Quantum spin models for numerosity perception.PloS one · 2023Article
- Quantifying the Autonomy of Structurally Diverse Automata: A Comparison of Candidate Measures.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Not All Structure and Dynamics Are Equal.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Of maps and grids.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Integrated Information Theory (IIT) of consciousness starts from essential phenomenological properties, which are then translated into postulates that any physical system must satisfy in order to specify the physical substrate of consciousness. We recently introduced an information measure (Barbosa et al., 2020) that captures three postulates of IIT-existence, intrinsicality and information-and is unique. Here we show that the new measure also satisfies the remaining postulates of IIT-integration and exclusion-and create the framework that identifies maximally irreducible mechanisms. These mechanisms can then form maximally irreducible systems, which in turn will specify the physical substrate of conscious experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.