Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33803763›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Comparison of Genetic Merit for Weight and Meat Traits between the Polled and Horned Cattle in Multiple Beef Breeds.

Imtiaz A S Randhawa, Michael R McGowan, Laercio R Porto-Neto, Ben J Hayes, Russell E Lyons

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Welfare of beef cattle.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Imtiaz A S RandhawaSchool of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7224-191X
Michael R McGowanSchool of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0783-4748
Laercio R Porto-NetoCSIRO Agriculture and Food, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia.
Ben J HayesCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Russell E LyonsSchool of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

Meat and Livestock Australia L.GEN.1713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding for polled animals is deemed the most practical solution to eradicate horns naturally and circumvent management costs and risks on health and welfare. However, there has been a historical reluctance by some farmers to select polled animals due to perceived lower productivity of their calves. This study has compared estimated breeding values (EBVs) between horned and polled animals (N = 2,466,785) for 12 production and carcass traits to assess historical (before 2000) and recent (2000-2018) genetic implications of poll breeding. Older generations of the polled animals in most breeds had significantly lower (Bonferroni-corrected

Indexed as

beef cattlegenetic correlationsgenetic potentialpoll breedingproduction traits

Identifiers

PMID33803763
PMCPMC8003249
OpenAlexW3137822608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.