Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33803525›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Assessing the Levels of Awareness among European Citizens about the Direct and Indirect Impacts of Plastics on Human Health.

Jelena Barbir, Walter Leal Filho, Amanda Lange Salvia, Maren Theresa Christin Fendt, Rachel Babaganov, Maria Cristina Albertini, Alessandra Bonoli, Maximilian Lackner, Daniela Müller de Quevedo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jelena BarbirFaculty of Life Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 21033 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9226-0680
Walter Leal FilhoFaculty of Life Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 21033 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1241-5225
Amanda Lange SalviaGraduate Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Passo Fundo, 99052-900 Passo Fundo, Brazil.
Maren Theresa Christin FendtFaculty of Life Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 21033 Hamburg, Germany.
Rachel BabaganovFaculty of Life Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 21033 Hamburg, Germany.
Maria Cristina AlbertiniDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4549-1475
Alessandra BonoliDepartment of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, 40131 Bologna, Italy.
Maximilian LacknerFaculty of Industrial Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien, Hoechstaedtplatz 6, 1200 Vienna, Austria.
Daniela Müller de QuevedoClean Technology Center, Feevale University, 93525-070 Novo Hamburgo, Brazil.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversidade de Passo Fundo · BRUniversidade Feevale · BRUniversity of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien · ATUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Urbino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an urgent need to assess European citizens' perspective regarding their plastic consumption and to evaluate their awareness of the direct and indirect effect of plastics on human health in order to influence current behavior trends. In this study, the evaluation has been cross-related with scientific facts, with the final aim of detecting the most recommendable paths in increasing human awareness, reducing plastic consumption, and consequently impacting human health. A statistical analysis of quantitative data, gathered from 1000 European citizens via an online survey in the period from May to June 2020, showed that a general awareness about the direct impact of plastic consumption and contamination (waste) on human health is high in Europe. However, only a few participants (from a higher educational group) were aware of the indirect negative effects that oil extraction and industrial production of plastic can have on human health. This finding calls for improved availability of this information to general public. Despite the participants' positive attitude toward active plastic reduction (61%), plastic consumption on a daily basis is still very high (86%). The most common current actions toward plastic reduction are plastic bag usage, reusage, or replacement with sustainable alternatives (e.g., textile bags) and selecting products with less plastic packaging. The participants showed important criticism toward the information available to the general public about plastics and health. This awareness is important since significant relation has been found between the available information and the participants' decisions on the actions they might undertake to reduce plastic consumption. The study clearly showed the willingness of the participants to take action, but they also requested to be strongly supported with joint efforts from government, policies, and marketing, defining it as the most successful way toward implementing these changes.

Indexed as

PlasticsProduct PackagingEuropeHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesPlasticsawarenessglobal assessmenthuman healthlitteringmicroplasticsplastics

Identifiers

PMID33803525
PMCPMC8003071
OpenAlexW3137996459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.