Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33803362›Full record

ArticleJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Innate Resistance and Phosphite Treatment Affect Both the Pathogen's and Host's Transcriptomes in the Tanoak-

Takao Kasuga, Katherine J Hayden, Catherine A Eyre, Peter J P Croucher, Shannon Schechter, Jessica W Wright, Matteo Garbelotto

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Takao KasugaCrops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, Davis, United States Department of Agriculture, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-0908
Katherine J HaydenDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Catherine A EyreDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Peter J P CroucherDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Shannon SchechterDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Jessica W WrightUnited States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis, CA 95618, USA.
Matteo GarbelottoDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · USAgricultural Research Service · USPacific Southwest Research Station · USRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 5306-22000-014-00DGordon and Betty Moore Foundation 2639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphites have been used to control Sudden Oak Death; however, their precise mode of action is not fully understood. To study the mechanism of action of phosphites, we conducted an inoculation experiment on two open-pollinated tanoak families, previously found to be partially resistant. Stems of treatment group individuals were sprayed with phosphite, and seven days later, distal leaves were inoculated with the Sudden Oak Death pathogen

Indexed as

gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)in planta RNA-SeqNotholithocarpus densiflorusphosphonateplant defenseSudden Oak Death (SOD)

Identifiers

PMID33803362
PMCPMC7999100
OpenAlexW3133671664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.