Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33803299›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Seroprevalence of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM among Adults over 65 Years Old in the South of Italy.

Immacolata Polvere, Alfredina Parrella, Giovanna Casamassa, Silvia D'Andrea, Annamaria Tizzano, Gaetano Cardinale, Serena Voccola, Piercarmine Porcaro, Romania Stilo, Pasquale Vito and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of Immunogenic Linear B-Cell Epitopes inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Immacolata PolvereDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università degli Studi del Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Alfredina ParrellaConsorzio Sannio Tech, 82030 Apollosa, Italy.
Giovanna CasamassaConsorzio Sannio Tech, 82030 Apollosa, Italy.
Silvia D'AndreaDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università degli Studi del Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Annamaria TizzanoDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università degli Studi del Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Gaetano CardinaleConsorzio Sannio Tech, 82030 Apollosa, Italy.
Serena VoccolaGenus Biotech, Università degli Studi del Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Piercarmine PorcaroConsorzio Sannio Tech, 82030 Apollosa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9251-2131
Romania StiloDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università degli Studi del Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Pasquale VitoDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università degli Studi del Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Tiziana ZottiDipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Università degli Studi del Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4753-116X
University of Sannio · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotic betacoronavirus associated with worldwide transmission of COVID-19 disease. By the beginning of March, WHO reported about 113,820,000 confirmed cases including more than 2,527,000 deaths all over the world. However, the true extent of virus circulation or its real infection/fatality ratio is not well-estimated due to the huge portion of asymptomatic infections. In this observational study, we have estimated the prevalence of specific immunoglobulin M and G directed towards SARS-CoV-2 antigen in a cohort of 1383 adult volunteers aged over 65 years old, living in the district of Benevento, in the South of Italy. Serological screening was carried out on capillary blood in September 2020, seven months after pandemic outbreak in Italy, to evaluate virus circulation and antibody response among elderly adults, in which severe symptoms due to viral infection are more common. The overall seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 4.70% (CI 3.70%-5.95%) with no statistically significant differences between sexes. Among these, 69.69% (CI 55.61%-77.80%) tested positive to IgM, 23.08% (CI 14.51%-34.64%) to IgG and 9.23% (CI 4.30%-18.71%) was positive for both. All patients that were positive to IgM underwent molecular testing through RT-qPCR on oral-rhino pharyngeal swabs and only one specimen was positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. Instead, the presence of IgG from screened volunteers was confirmed by re-testing serum samples using both an ELISA assay validated for in vitro diagnostic use (IVD) and a recently published synthetic peptide-based ELISA assay. In conclusion, our report suggests that (1) early restrictions were successful in limiting COVID-19 diffusion in the district of Benevento; (2) rapid serological analysis is an ideal testing for both determining real seroprevalence and massive screening, whereas detection of viral RNA remains a gold standard for identification of infected patients; (3) even among people without COVID-19 related symptoms, the antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 antigens has individual features.

Indexed as

antibodiesCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2serological test

Identifiers

PMID33803299
PMCPMC8001683
OpenAlexW3134566763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.