Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33803265›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Detection of Myocardial Infarction Using ECG and Multi-Scale Feature Concatenate.

Jia-Zheng Jian, Tzong-Rong Ger, Han-Hua Lai, Chi-Ming Ku, Chiung-An Chen, Patricia Angela R Abu, Shih-Lun Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Automatic detection and visualization of myocardial infarction in electrocardiograms based on an interpretable deep learning model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [A review on intelligent auxiliary diagnosis methods based on electrocardiograms for myocardial infarction].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Intelligent Biosignal Analysis Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jia-Zheng JianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan.
Tzong-Rong GerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5472-431X
Han-Hua LaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan.
Chi-Ming KuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan.
Chiung-An ChenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City 243303, Taiwan.
Patricia Angela R AbuDepartment of Information Systems and Computer Science, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City 1108, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-8848-6644
Shih-Lun ChenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4079-9350
Chung Yuan Christian University · TWAteneo de Manila University · PHMing Chi University of Technology · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diverse computer-aided diagnosis systems based on convolutional neural networks were applied to automate the detection of myocardial infarction (MI) found in electrocardiogram (ECG) for early diagnosis and prevention. However, issues, particularly overfitting and underfitting, were not being taken into account. In other words, it is unclear whether the network structure is too simple or complex. Toward this end, the proposed models were developed by starting with the simplest structure: a multi-lead features-concatenate narrow network (N-Net) in which only two convolutional layers were included in each lead branch. Additionally, multi-scale features-concatenate networks (MSN-Net) were also implemented where larger features were being extracted through pooling the signals. The best structure was obtained via tuning both the number of filters in the convolutional layers and the number of inputting signal scales. As a result, the N-Net reached a 95.76% accuracy in the MI detection task, whereas the MSN-Net reached an accuracy of 61.82% in the MI locating task. Both networks give a higher average accuracy and a significant difference of

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMyocardial InfarctionDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectrocardiographyHumansNeural Networks, Computeraccuracyclassifiersconvolution neural network (CNN)electrocardiographyk-fold validationmyocardial infarctionsensitivity

Identifiers

PMID33803265
PMCPMC7967244
OpenAlexW3135044385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.