Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33803205›Full record

ArticleMembranes2021

The Early Fragmentation of a Bovine Dermis-Derived Collagen Barrier Membrane Contributes to Transmembraneous Vascularization-A Possible Paradigm Shift for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Eleni Kapogianni, Said Alkildani, Milena Radenkovic, Xin Xiong, Rumen Krastev, Ignacio Stöwe, James Bielenstein, Ole Jung, Stevo Najman, Mike Barbeck and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Rapid and Convenient Approach to Construct Porous Collagen MembranesFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Eleni KapogianniPrivate Practice, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
Said AlkildaniBerlinAnalytix GmbH, 12109 Berlin, Germany.
Milena RadenkovicScientific Research Center for Biomedicine, Department for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nis, 18108 Nis, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-0603-0684
Xin XiongNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, 72770 Reutlingen, Germany.
Rumen KrastevNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, 72770 Reutlingen, Germany.
Ignacio StöweHelios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Gefäßzentrum Berlin Südwest, 14165 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1625-5417
James BielensteinBerlinAnalytix GmbH, 12109 Berlin, Germany.
Ole JungClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Stevo NajmanDepartment of Biology and Human Genetics, Department for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nis, 18108 Nis, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-2411-9802
Mike BarbeckBerlinAnalytix GmbH, 12109 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3001-1347
Daniel RothamelDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Evangelic Johanniter Hospital Bethesda Mönchengladbach, 41061 Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Natural and Medical Sciences Institute · DEUniversity of Nis · RSEvangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda Mönchengladbach · DEHelios Klinikum Emil von Behring · DETechnische Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collagen-based barrier membranes are an essential component in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) procedures. They act as cell-occlusive devices that should maintain a micromilieu where bone tissue can grow, which in turn provides a stable bed for prosthetic implantation. However, the standing time of collagen membranes has been a challenging area, as native membranes are often prematurely resorbed. Therefore, consolidation techniques, such as chemical cross-linking, have been used to enhance the structural integrity of the membranes, and by consequence, their standing time. However, these techniques have cytotoxic tendencies and can cause exaggerated inflammation and in turn, premature resorption, and material failures. However, tissues from different extraction sites and animals are variably cross-linked. For the present in vivo study, a new collagen membrane based on bovine dermis was extracted and compared to a commercially available porcine-sourced collagen membrane extracted from the pericardium. The membranes were implanted in Wistar rats for up to 60 days. The analyses included well-established histopathological and histomorphometrical methods, including histochemical and immunohistochemical staining procedures, to detect M1- and M2-macrophages as well as blood vessels. Initially, the results showed that both membranes remained intact up to day 30, while the bovine membrane was fragmented at day 60 with granulation tissue infiltrating the implantation beds. In contrast, the porcine membrane remained stable without signs of material-dependent inflammatory processes. Therefore, the bovine membrane showed a special integration pattern as the fragments were found to be overlapping, providing secondary porosity in combination with a transmembraneous vascularization. Altogether, the bovine membrane showed comparable results to the porcine control group in terms of biocompatibility and standing time. Moreover, blood vessels were found within the bovine membranes, which can potentially serve as an additional functionality of barrier membranes that conventional barrier membranes do not provide.

Indexed as

barrier membranebovine collagenbovine dermisGuided Bone Regeneration (GBR)porcine collagenporcine pericardiumtissue regenerationtissue sourcetransmembraneous vascularization

Identifiers

PMID33803205
PMCPMC7999168
OpenAlexW3133674852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.