ReviewPharmaceutics2021
3DP Printing of Oral Solid Formulations: A Systematic Review.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent Circular Polymer Additive Manufacturing: From Recycling Pathways to Lifecycle Engineering.Polymers · 2026Review
- AI Applied to Formulation Design, Process Optimization, and Quality Control in 3D Printed Drug Products: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Electronic Syringe and Pan Coating Techniques for Loading of FDM 3D Printed Tablets.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fabricating Oral Disintegrating Tablets Without Disintegrant Using Powder-Based 3D Printing.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Novel Soft Dosage Forms for Paediatric Applications: Can We 3D-Print Them or Not?Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing Technology in Drug Design and Development: Feasibility, Challenges, and Potential Applications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- 3D printing processes in precise drug delivery for personalized medicine.Biofabrication · 2024Review
- 3D Printed Personalized Colon-targeted Tablets: A Novel Approach in Ulcerative Colitis Management.Current drug delivery · 2024Review
- 3D printing of amorphous solid dispersions: A comparison of fused deposition modeling and drop-on-powder printing.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2023Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis of 3D Printing in Personalized Medicine Research from 2012 to 2022.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D-printing technique.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2023Article
- [Preparation andBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D Printing of the Thermo-Sensitive Peptidomimetic Drug Enalapril Maleate.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- [Preparation andBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022Article
- 3D Printing in Solid Dosage Forms and Organ-on-Chip Applications.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Design, Preparation and In Vitro Evaluation of Core-Shell Fused Deposition Modelling 3D-Printed Verapamil Hydrochloride Pulsatile Tablets.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Mini-Tablets: A Valid Strategy to Combine Efficacy and Safety in Pediatrics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- 3D printing of nanocomposite pills through desktop vat photopolymerization (stereolithography) for drug delivery reasons.3D printing in medicine · 2022Article
- Coupling of Fused Deposition Modeling and Inkjet Printing to Produce Drug Loaded 3D Printed Tablets.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a recent technology, which gives the possibility to manufacture personalised dosage forms and it has a broad range of applications. One of the most developed, it is the manufacture of oral solid dosage and the four 3DP techniques which have been more used for their manufacture are FDM, inkjet 3DP, SLA and SLS. This systematic review is carried out to statistically analyze the current 3DP techniques employed in manufacturing oral solid formulations and assess the recent trends of this new technology. The work has been organised into four steps, (1) screening of the articles, definition of the inclusion and exclusion criteria and classification of the articles in the two main groups (included/excluded); (2) quantification and characterisation of the included articles; (3) evaluation of the validity of data and data extraction process; (4) data analysis, discussion, and conclusion to define which technique offers the best properties to be applied in the manufacture of oral solid formulations. It has been observed that with SLS 3DP technique, all the characterisation tests required by the BP (drug content, drug dissolution profile, hardness, friability, disintegration time and uniformity of weight) have been performed in the majority of articles, except for the friability test. However, it is not possible to define which of the four 3DP techniques is the most suitable for the manufacture of oral solid formulations, because the selection is affected by different parameters, such as the type of formulation, the physical-mechanical properties to achieve. Moreover, each technique has its specific advantages and disadvantages, such as for FDM the biggest challenge is the degradation of the drug, due to high printing temperature process or for SLA is the toxicity of the carcinogenic risk of the photopolymerising material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.