Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33802880›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Data Mining in Healthcare: Applying Strategic Intelligence Techniques to Depict 25 Years of Research Development.

Maikel Luis Kolling, Leonardo B Furstenau, Michele Kremer Sott, Bruna Rabaioli, Pedro Henrique Ulmi, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Leonel Pablo Carvalho Tedesco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implementation of Health Information Systems to Improve Patient Identification.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Extracting Significant Comorbid Diseases from MeSH Index of PubMed.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maikel Luis KollingGraduate Program of Industrial Systems and Processes, University of Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul 96816-501, Brazil.
Leonardo B FurstenauDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90035-190, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8984-7774
Michele Kremer SottGraduate Program of Industrial Systems and Processes, University of Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul 96816-501, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7428-3993
Bruna RabaioliDepartment of Medicine, University of Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul 96816-501, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1844-8420
Pedro Henrique UlmiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul 96816-501, Brazil.
Nicola Luigi BragazziLaboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8409-868X
Leonel Pablo Carvalho TedescoGraduate Program of Industrial Systems and Processes, University of Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul 96816-501, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3010-8197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to identify the strategic topics and the thematic evolution structure of data mining applied to healthcare, in this paper, a bibliometric performance and network analysis (BPNA) was conducted. For this purpose, 6138 articles were sourced from the Web of Science covering the period from 1995 to July 2020 and the SciMAT software was used. Our results present a strategic diagram composed of 19 themes, of which the 8 motor themes ('NEURAL-NETWORKS', 'CANCER', 'ELETRONIC-HEALTH-RECORDS', 'DIABETES-MELLITUS', 'ALZHEIMER'S-DISEASE', 'BREAST-CANCER', 'DEPRESSION', and 'RANDOM-FOREST') are depicted in a thematic network. An in-depth analysis was carried out in order to find hidden patterns and to provide a general perspective of the field. The thematic network structure is arranged thusly that its subjects are organized into two different areas, (i) practices and techniques related to data mining in healthcare, and (ii) health concepts and disease supported by data mining, embodying, respectively, the hotspots related to the data mining and medical scopes, hence demonstrating the field's evolution over time. Such results make it possible to form the basis for future research and facilitate decision-making by researchers and practitioners, institutions, and governments interested in data mining in healthcare.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchData MiningBibliometricsDelivery of Health CareHumansIntelligencebibliometricsco-word analysisdata mininghealthcare 4.0industry 4.0science mappingSciMATstrategic intelligence

Identifiers

PMID33802880
PMCPMC8002654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.