Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33802722›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Mass Casualty Decontamination for Chemical Incidents: Research Outcomes and Future Priorities.

Samuel Collins, Thomas James, Holly Carter, Charles Symons, Felicity Southworth, Kerry Foxall, Tim Marczylo, Richard Amlôt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Changing patterns in chemical terrorism 1970-2021.Frontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Advancing the scientific study of prehospital mass casualty response through a Translational Science process: the T1 scoping literature review stage.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The wash-in effect and its significance for mass casualty decontamination.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samuel CollinsChemicals and Environmental Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Didcot OX11 0RQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4721-0040
Thomas JamesChemicals and Environmental Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Didcot OX11 0RQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9295-014X
Holly CarterCOVID-19 Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, Public Health England, Public Health England, London SE1 8UG, UK.
Charles SymonsCOVID-19 Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, Public Health England, Public Health England, London SE1 8UG, UK.
Felicity SouthworthBehavioural Science, Emergency Response Department Science & Technology, Health Protection Directorate, Public Health England, Porton SP4 0JG, UK.
Kerry FoxallToxicology Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Didcot OX11 0RQ, UK.
Tim MarczyloToxicology Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Didcot OX11 0RQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9744-473X
Richard AmlôtCOVID-19 Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, Public Health England, Public Health England, London SE1 8UG, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research PR-ST-1015-10016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planning for major incidents involving the release of hazardous chemicals has been informed by a multi-disciplinary research agenda which has sought to inform all aspects of emergency response, but with a focus in recent years on mass casualty decontamination. In vitro and human volunteer studies have established the relative effectiveness of different decontamination protocols for a range of chemical agents. In parallel, a programme of research has focused on communicating with and managing large numbers of contaminated casualties at the scene of an incident. We present an accessible overview of the evidence underpinning current casualty decontamination strategies. We highlight where research outcomes can directly inform response planning, including the critical importance of beginning the decontamination process as soon as possible, the benefits of early removal of contaminated clothing, the evidence under-pinning dry and wet decontamination and how effective communication is essential to any decontamination response. We identify a range of priority areas for future research including establishing the significance of the 'wash-in' effect and developing effective strategies for the decontamination of hair. We also highlight several areas of future methodological development, such as the need for novel chemical simulants. Whilst considerable progress has been made towards incorporating research outcomes into operational policy and practice, we outline how this developing evidence-base might be used to inform future iterations of mass casualty decontamination guidance.

Indexed as

Chemical Hazard ReleaseDisaster PlanningMass Casualty IncidentsDecontaminationEmergenciesHazardous SubstancesHumansHazardous Substanceschemicaldecontaminationmass casualty

Identifiers

PMID33802722
PMCPMC8002470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.