Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33802308›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Pharmacological Conditioning of the Heart: An Update on Experimental Developments and Clinical Implications.

Sebastian Roth, Carolin Torregroza, Katharina Feige, Benedikt Preckel, Markus W Hollmann, Nina C Weber, Ragnar Huhn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mitochondrial Kinase Signaling for Cardioprotection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Do We Really Need Aspirin Loading for STEMI?Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sebastian RothDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Carolin TorregrozaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Katharina FeigeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Benedikt PreckelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (AUMC), Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4412-9183
Markus W HollmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (AUMC), Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nina C WeberDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (AUMC), Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1111-9042
Ragnar HuhnDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of pharmacological conditioning is to protect the heart against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and its consequences. There is extensive literature that reports a multitude of different cardioprotective signaling molecules and mechanisms in diverse experimental protocols. Several pharmacological agents have been evaluated in terms of myocardial I/R injury. While results from experimental studies are immensely encouraging, translation into the clinical setting remains unsatisfactory. This narrative review wants to focus on two aspects: (1) give a comprehensive update on new developments of pharmacological conditioning in the experimental setting concentrating on recent literature of the last two years and (2) briefly summarize clinical evidence of these cardioprotective substances in the perioperative setting highlighting their clinical implications. By directly opposing each pharmacological agent regarding its recent experimental knowledge and most important available clinical data, a clear overview is given demonstrating the remaining gap between basic research and clinical practice. Finally, future perspectives are given on how we might overcome the limited translatability in the field of pharmacological conditioning.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiotonic AgentsHeartHumansIschemic Preconditioning, MyocardialMyocardial Reperfusion InjurySignal TransductionCardiotonic Agentscardioprotectionischemia reperfusion injurymolecular mechanismspostconditioningpreconditioning

Identifiers

PMID33802308
PMCPMC7959135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.