Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33802121›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2021

Magnetosomes and Magnetosome Mimics: Preparation, Cancer Cell Uptake and Functionalization for Future Cancer Therapies.

Zainab Taher, Christopher Legge, Natalie Winder, Pawel Lysyganicz, Andrea Rawlings, Helen Bryant, Munitta Muthana, Sarah Staniland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Innovative Nanocarriers: Magnetosomes in the Fight against Cancer.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Neurosurgical Applications of Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy.Neurosurgery clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zainab TaherDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield S3 7HF, UK.
Christopher LeggeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield S3 7HF, UK.
Natalie WinderDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield S3 7HF, UK.
Pawel LysyganiczDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield S3 7HF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8526-6622
Andrea RawlingsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield S3 7HF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3465-4195
Helen BryantDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2720-7020
Munitta MuthanaDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2497-8903
Sarah StanilandDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield S3 7HF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8995-7172
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 24321Cancer Research UK NS/A000064/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic magnetite nanoparticles (MNP) are heralded as model vehicles for nanomedicine, particularly cancer therapeutics. However, there are many methods of synthesizing different sized and coated MNP, which may affect their performance as nanomedicines. Magnetosomes are naturally occurring, lipid-coated MNP that exhibit exceptional hyperthermic heating, but their properties, cancer cell uptake and toxicity have yet to be compared to other MNP. Magnetosomes can be mimicked by coating MNP in either amphiphilic oleic acid or silica. In this study, magnetosomes are directly compared to control MNP, biomimetic oleic acid and silica coated MNP of varying sizes. MNP are characterized and compared with respect to size, magnetism, and surface properties. Small (8 ± 1.6 nm) and larger (32 ± 9.9 nm) MNP are produced by two different methods and coated with either silica or oleic acid, increasing the size and the size dispersity of the MNP. The coated larger MNP are comparable in size (49 ± 12.5 nm and 61 ± 18.2 nm) to magnetosomes (46 ± 11.8 nm) making good magnetosome mimics. All MNP are assessed and compared for cancer cell uptake in MDA-MB-231 cells and importantly, all are readily taken up with minimal toxic effect. Silica coated MNP show the most uptake with greater than 60% cell uptake at the highest concentration, and magnetosomes showing the least with less than 40% at the highest concentration, while size does not have a significant effect on uptake. Finally, surface functionalization is demonstrated for magnetosomes and silica coated MNP using biotinylation and EDC-NHS, respectively, to conjugate fluorescent probes. The modified particles are visualized in MDA-MB-231 cells and demonstrate how both naturally biosynthesized magnetosomes and biomimetic silica coated MNP can be functionalized and readily up taken by cancer cells for realization as nanomedical vehicles.

Indexed as

Biotinylationcell uptakefunctionalizationmagnetitemagnetosomeMDA-MB-231silica coating

Identifiers

PMID33802121
PMCPMC7998144
OpenAlexW3133646153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.