ReviewBiology2021
Effect of Tibolone on Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bone Health for Gynaecologists.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Strategies in Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Proposal for targeted, neo-evolutionary-oriented secondary prevention of early-onset endometriosis and adenomyosis. Part II: medical interventions.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Effects of tibolone combined with zoledronic acid on bone density, bone metabolism, and pain in postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Oral Therapeutics Post Menopausal Osteoporosis.Cureus · 2023Review
- Mitigating the economic burden of GnRH agonist therapy for progestogen-resistant endometriosis: why not?Human reproduction open · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Low bone mineral density (BMD) on postmenopausal women causes bone fragility and fracture risk. Tibolone seems to prevent bone loss. Therefore, this systematic review with meta-analysis synthesizes the tibolone effect on BMD percent change in lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) in postmenopausal women. Controlled trials that provided tibolone evidence on the efficacy of tibolone in preventing loss of BMD were included. Regarding the included studies, a pooled mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) was estimated to determine the BMD percentage change. Eleven studies were identified and eight were included in the quantitative analysis. Tibolone at a dose of 2.5 mg increased BMD compared with non-active controls at 24 months in LS (MD 4.87%, 95%CI: 4.16-5.57, and MD 7.35%, 95%CI: 2.68-12.01); and FN (MD 4.85%, 95%CI: 1.55-8.15, and 4.21%, 95%CI: 2.99-5.42), with Hologic and Lunar scanners, respectively. No difference was observed when tibolone 2.5 mg dose was compared with estrogen therapy (ET) at 24 months, LS (MD -0.58%, 95%CI: -3.77-2.60), FN (MD -0.29%, 95%CI: -1.37-0.79), and TH (MD -0.12%, 95%CI: -2.28-2.53). Therefore, tibolone increases BMD in LS and FN compared to non-active controls, and there was no showed difference with ET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.