Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33801987›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2021

Diagnostic Value of Conventional PET Parameters and Radiomic Features Extracted from 18F-FDG-PET/CT for Histologic Subtype Classification and Characterization of Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Philippe Thuillier, Virginia Liberini, Osvaldo Rampado, Elena Gallio, Bruno De Santi, Francesco Ceci, Jasna Metovic, Mauro Papotti, Marco Volante, Filippo Molinari and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Clinicopathological, Oncogenic, andContrast media & molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Philippe ThuillierNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Virginia LiberiniNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Osvaldo RampadoMedical Physics Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3078-5438
Elena GallioMedical Physics Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Bruno De SantiBiolab, Department of Electronics and Telecomunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.
Francesco CeciNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9785-5248
Jasna MetovicPathology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9146-1747
Mauro PapottiPathology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Marco VolanteDepartment of Oncology, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Filippo MolinariBiolab, Department of Electronics and Telecomunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1150-2244
Désirée DeandreisNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.

Funding

Fondazione CRT 2019.0590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate if conventional Positron emission tomography (PET) parameters and radiomic features (RFs) extracted by 18F-FDG-PET/CT can differentiate among different histological subtypes of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms (Lu-NENs).

methodsForty-four naïve-treatment patients on whom 18F-FDG-PET/CT was performed for histologically confirmed Lu-NEN (n = 46) were retrospectively included. Manual segmentation was performed by two operators allowing for extraction of four conventional PET parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) and 41 RFs. Lu-NENs were classified into two groups: lung neuroendocrine tumors (Lu-NETs) vs. lung neuroendocrine carcinomas (Lu-NECs). Lu-NETs were classified according to histological subtypes (typical (TC)/atypical carcinoid (AC)), Ki67-level, and TNM staging. The least absolute shrink age and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to select the most predictive RFs for classification and Pearson correlation analysis was performed between conventional PET parameters and selected RFs.

resultsPET parameters, in particular, SUVmax (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.91; cut-off = 5.16) were higher in Lu-NECs vs. Lu-NETs (

conclusionIn our study, conventional PET parameters were able to distinguish Lu-NECs from Lu-NETs, but not TC from AC. RFs did not provide additional information.

Indexed as

18FDG-PET/CTcarcinoid tumorlung neuroendocrine neoplasmRadiomicstexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID33801987
PMCPMC8001140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.