Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33801944›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

How to Represent Paintings: A Painting Classification Using Artistic Comments.

Wentao Zhao, Dalin Zhou, Xinguo Qiu, Wei Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Big Transfer Learning for Fine Art Classification.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wentao ZhaoCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0321-7750
Dalin ZhouSchool of Computing, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3HE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2363-9125
Xinguo QiuCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.
Wei JiangCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.

Funding

Key Laboratory of E&M (Zhejiang University of Technology), Ministry of Education & Zhejiang Province Grant No. EM 2016070101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of large-scale automatic paintings analysis is to classify and retrieve images using machine learning techniques. The traditional methods use computer vision techniques on paintings to enable computers to represent the art content. In this work, we propose using a graph convolutional network and artistic comments rather than the painting color to classify type, school, timeframe and author of the paintings by implementing natural language processing (NLP) techniques. First, we build a single artistic comment graph based on co-occurrence relations and document word relations and then train an art graph convolutional network (ArtGCN) on the entire corpus. The nodes, which include the words and documents in the topological graph are initialized using a one-hot representation; then, the embeddings are learned jointly for both words and documents, supervised by the known-class training labels of the paintings. Through extensive experiments on different classification tasks using different input sources, we demonstrate that the proposed methods achieve state-of-art performance. In addition, ArtGCN can learn word and painting embeddings, and we find that they have a major role in describing the labels and retrieval paintings, respectively.

Indexed as

art classificationgraph convolutional networksmachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID33801944
PMCPMC7999742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.