Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33801766›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Early Clinical Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy/Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Combination in Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Alone in Oropharynx Cancer Patients.

Han Gyul Yoon, Yong Chan Ahn, Dongryul Oh, Jae Myoung Noh, Seung Gyu Park, Heerim Nam, Sang Gyu Ju, Dongyeol Kwon, Seyjoon Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evidence-based indications for proton therapy in adults determined using the GRADE approach.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of particle therapy · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Han Gyul YoonSamsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9515-1623
Yong Chan AhnSamsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1971-8472
Dongryul OhSamsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Jae Myoung NohSamsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3897-6127
Seung Gyu ParkKeimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu 42601, Korea.
Heerim NamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Korea.
Sang Gyu JuSamsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Dongyeol KwonSamsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Seyjoon ParkSamsung Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRYonsei University · KRKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the early clinical outcomes of combining intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in comparison with IMRT alone in treating oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe medical records of 148 OPC patients who underwent definitive radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent systemic therapy, from January 2016 till December 2019 at Samsung Medical Center, were retrospectively reviewed. During the 5.5 weeks' RT course, the initial 16 (or 18) fractions were delivered by IMRT in all patients, and the subsequent 12 (or 10) fractions were either by IMRT in 81 patients (IMRT only) or by IMPT in 67 (IMRT/IMPT combination), respectively, based on comparison of adaptive re-plan profiles and availability of equipment. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was done on 76 patients (38 from each group) for comparative analyses.

resultsWith the median follow-up of 24.7 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival and progression free survival between groups, both before and after PSM. Before PSM, the IMRT/IMPT combination group experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities less frequently: mucositis in 37.0% and 13.4% (

conclusionsIn treating the OPC patients, with comparable early oncologic outcomes, more favorable acute toxicity profiles were achieved following IMRT/IMPT combination than IMRT alone.

Indexed as

acute toxicityoropharyngeal cancerproton beam therapyradiation therapysurvival

Identifiers

PMID33801766
PMCPMC8037748
OpenAlexW3144302773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.