Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33801552›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Biomechanical Analysis in Five Bar Linkage Prototype Machine of Gait Training and Rehabilitation by IMU Sensor and Electromyography.

Jeong-Woo Seo, Hyeong-Sic Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeong-Woo SeoFuture Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34504, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2661-349X
Hyeong-Sic KimHUCA System Inc., Daegu 41061, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prototype machine of gait training and rehabilitation (MGTR) with a five-bar linkage structure was designed to improve the common end-effector type. Additionally, the study was conducted to evaluate the joint angle and muscle activity during walking for the evaluation of prototype: (1) Background: The gait rehabilitation systems are largely divided into exoskeletal type and end-effector type. The end-effector type can be improved a gait trajectory similar to normal gait according to this prototype. Therefore, a new design of prototype MGTR is proposed in this study. (2) Methods: The gait experience was conducted with thirteen healthy male subjects using an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor and electromyography (EMG). It was compared that the hip and knee joints and the muscle activity between the normal gait and MGTR. (3) Results: The results showed that there was a high correlation between the knee joint angle for normal gait and MGTR. The range of motion (RoM) was small for the MGTR. The EMG results showed that the activation of the rectus femoris muscle was most similar to the normal gait and MGTR. (4) Conclusions: The characteristics of the kinematic variables of the subjects varied widely. It is necessary to modify the machine so that the link length can be adjusted in consideration of various segment lengths of patients.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyHumansKnee JointMaleMuscle, SkeletalRange of Motion, Articularelectromyographyfive-bar linkagegait analysisIMU sensormachine of gait training and rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID33801552
PMCPMC7958945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.