Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33801419›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Overall Complication Rates of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstructions in Germany-A Multi-Center Analysis Based on the DGPRÄC Prospective National Online Registry for Microsurgical Breast Reconstructions.

Paul I Heidekrueger, Nicholas Moellhoff, Raymund E Horch, Jörn A Lohmeyer, Mario Marx, Christoph Heitmann, Hisham Fansa, Matthias Geenen, Christian J Gabka, Steffen Handstein and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06523920 (Protecting Autologous Free Flaps From Ischemia/Reperfusion Damage With Cold Storage), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06523920 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Protecting Autologous Free Flaps From Ischemia/Reperfusion Damage With Cold Storage: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CagliariRan2024 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsIschemia Reperfusion InjuryArmsUniversity of Wisconsin solution + cold storage, Unperfused free flap under warm ischemia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Paul I HeidekruegerCentre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4656-3808
Nicholas MoellhoffDivision of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Raymund E HorchDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-2353
Jörn A LohmeyerDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Hamburg, 20259 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1721-9706
Mario MarxDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Breast Surgery, Elbland Hospital Radebeul, 01445 Radebeul, Germany.
Christoph HeitmannSENO Clinic, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Hisham FansaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Breast Centre Spital Zollikerberg, 8125 Zollikerberg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-8408
Matthias GeenenDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery, Lubinus Clinic Kiel, 24106 Kiel, Germany.
Christian J GabkaNymphenburg Clinic for Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, 80636 Munich, Germany.
Steffen HandsteinDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Breast Surgery, Municipal Hospital Goerlitz, 02828 Görlitz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8369-6247
Lukas PrantlCentre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Uwe von FritschenDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Helios Hospital Emil von Behring, 14165 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3415-3051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While autologous breast reconstruction has gained momentum over recent years, there is limited data on the structure and quality of care of microsurgical breast reconstruction in Germany. Using the breast reconstruction database established by the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC), the presented study investigated the overall outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions in Germany. Data of 3926 patients and 4577 DIEP flaps performed by 22 centers were included in this study. Demographics, patient characteristics, perioperative details and postoperative outcomes were accounted for. Centers performing < Ø 40 (low-volume (LV)) vs. ≥ Ø 40 (high-volume (HV)) annual DIEP flaps were analyzed separately. Overall, total and partial flap loss rates were as low as 2.0% and 1.1% respectively, and emergent vascular revision surgery was performed in 4.3% of cases. Revision surgery due to wound complications was conducted in 8.3% of all cases. Mean operative time and length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the HV group (LV: 385.82 min vs. HV: 287.14 min; LV: 9.04 (18.87) days vs. HV: 8.21 (5.04) days; both

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast reconstructiondeep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flapmicrosurgeryplastic surgeryreconstructive surgery

Identifiers

PMID33801419
PMCPMC7958631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.