Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33801266›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Autophagy and Extracellular Vesicles in Colorectal Cancer: Interactions and Common Actors?

Clément Auger, Niki Christou, Aude Brunel, Aurélie Perraud, Mireille Verdier

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clément AugerEA 3842, CAPTuR, GEIST, Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025 Limoges CEDEX, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5260-535X
Niki ChristouEA 3842, CAPTuR, GEIST, Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025 Limoges CEDEX, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2125-0503
Aude BrunelEA 3842, CAPTuR, GEIST, Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025 Limoges CEDEX, France.
Aurélie PerraudEA 3842, CAPTuR, GEIST, Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025 Limoges CEDEX, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7882-0613
Mireille VerdierEA 3842, CAPTuR, GEIST, Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025 Limoges CEDEX, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8162-4856
Université de Limoges · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a homeostatic process involved in the degradation of disabled proteins and organelles using lysosomes. This mechanism requires the recruitment of specialized proteins for vesicle trafficking, that may also be involved in other types of machinery such as the biogenesis and secretion of extracellular vesicles (EVs), and particularly small EVs called exosomes. Among these proteins, Rab-GTPases may operate in both pathways, thus representing an interesting avenue for further study regarding the interaction between autophagy and extracellular vesicle machinery. Both mechanisms are involved in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly in cancer stem cell (CSC) survival and communication, although they are not specific to CRC or CSCs. This highlights the importance of studying the crosstalk between autophagy and EVs biogenesis and release.

Indexed as

autophagycolorectal cancerextracellular vesiclesrab-GTPasessecretory autophagy

Identifiers

PMID33801266
PMCPMC7958126
OpenAlexW3135141686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.