Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33801205›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Current Advances in Comprehending Dynamics of Regenerating Axons and Axon-Glia Interactions after Peripheral Nerve Injury in Zebrafish.

David Gonzalez, Miguel L Allende

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Zebrafish as a Model for Neurological Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Peripheral Nerve Injury Treatments and Advances: One Health Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David GonzalezFONDAP Center for Genome Regulation, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago RM 7800003, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9720-1452
Miguel L AllendeFONDAP Center for Genome Regulation, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago RM 7800003, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-2783-2152
University of Chile · CL

Funding

Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica ANID/FONDAP 15090007Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica ANID/Fondecyt 3200061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following an injury, axons of both the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) degenerate through a coordinated and genetically conserved mechanism known as Wallerian degeneration (WD). Unlike central axons, severed peripheral axons have a higher capacity to regenerate and reinnervate their original targets, mainly because of the favorable environment that they inhabit and the presence of different cell types. Even though many aspects of regeneration in peripheral nerves have been studied, there is still a lack of understanding regarding the dynamics of axonal degeneration and regeneration, mostly due to the inherent limitations of most animal models. In this scenario, the use of zebrafish (

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsAxonsNeurogliaPeripheral Nerve InjuriesZebrafishaxonal degenerationaxonal regenerationDanio rerioperipheral nerve injuryperipheral nervous systemSchwann cellszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID33801205
PMCPMC7957880
OpenAlexW3135902319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.