Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33801077›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Determinants of Panic Buying during COVID-19.

Grace Chua, Kum Fai Yuen, Xueqin Wang, Yiik Diew Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Managing Fear During Pandemics: Risks and Opportunities.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. (Why) Is Misinformation a Problem?Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Model of Panic Buying and Workforce under COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grace ChuaSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Kum Fai YuenSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-6661
Xueqin WangDepartment of International Logistics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9134-5327
Yiik Diew WongSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7419-5777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has seen an unmatched level of panic buying globally, a type of herd behavior whereby consumers buy an uncommonly huge amount of products because of a perception of scarcity. Drawing on the health belief model, perceived scarcity, and anticipated regret theories, this paper formulated a theoretical model that linked the determinants of panic buying and analyzed their interrelationships. Subsequently, data were collated from 508 consumers through an online survey questionnaire in Singapore that was conducted during the early stage of the pandemic, before the onset of the circuit breaker in April 2020. Next, an analysis of the results was done through structural equation modeling. It showed that the effect of the health belief model dimensions (i.e., perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, outcome expectation, cues to action, and self-efficacy) on panic buying is partially mediated by the consumers' perceived scarcity of products. Furthermore, the effect of perceived scarcity on panic buying is partially mediated by consumers' anticipation of regret. This paper expands on the current theoretical understanding of panic buying behavior, giving insights into the possible measures and solutions that policymakers and relevant stakeholders can uptake to manage panic buying in future a pandemic or health crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansPanicSARS-CoV-2Singaporeanticipated regretCOVID-19health belief modelhealth crisispanic buyingperceived scarcity

Identifiers

PMID33801077
PMCPMC8003931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.