Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33800933›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Effects of tDCS on Sound Duration in Patients with Apraxia of Speech in Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Charalambos Themistocleous, Kimberly Webster, Kyrana Tsapkini

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An Update on Apraxia of Speech.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charalambos ThemistocleousDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9138-0939
Kimberly WebsterDepartment of Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.
Kyrana TsapkiniDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in spoken and written production in primary progressive aphasiaR01DC014475 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TSAPKINI, KYRANA · 2015 to 2019
$4.1M
Transcranial direct current stimulation in typical and atypical Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG068881 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TSAPKINI, KYRANA · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068881NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014475NIH HHS NIH/NIDCD R01 DC014475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) was found to improve oral and written naming in post-stroke and primary progressive aphasia (PPA), speech fluency in stuttering, a developmental speech-motor disorder, and apraxia of speech (AOS) symptoms in post-stroke aphasia. This paper addressed the question of whether tDCS over the left IFG coupled with speech therapy may improve sound duration in patients with apraxia of speech (AOS) symptoms in non-fluent PPA (nfvPPA/AOS) more than sham. Eight patients with non-fluent PPA/AOS received either active or sham tDCS, along with speech therapy for 15 sessions. Speech therapy involved repeating words of increasing syllable-length. Evaluations took place before, immediately after, and two months post-intervention. Words were segmented into vowels and consonants and the duration of each vowel and consonant was measured. Segmental duration was significantly shorter after tDCS compared to sham and tDCS gains generalized to untrained words. The effects of tDCS sustained over two months post-treatment in trained and untrained sounds. Taken together, these results demonstrate that tDCS over the left IFG may facilitate speech production by reducing segmental duration. The results provide preliminary evidence that tDCS may maximize efficacy of speech therapy in patients with nfvPPA/AOS.

Indexed as

apraxia of speech (AOS)brain stimulationinferior frontal gyrus (IFG)primary progressive aphasia (PPA)sound durationtranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Identifiers

PMID33800933
PMCPMC8000042
OpenAlexW3133682327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.