Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33800910›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Adaptation and Measurement Invariance by Gender of the Flourishing Scale in a Colombian Sample.

Marta Martín-Carbonell, Begoña Espejo, Irene Checa, Martha Fernández-Daza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Measurement of flourishing: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Validation and Test of Measurement Invariance of the Adapted Health Consciousness Scale (HCS-G).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta Martín-CarbonellPsychology Department, Cooperative University of Colombia, Troncal del Caribe S/N, 470002 Santa Marta, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6337-577X
Begoña EspejoDepartment of Behavioral Sciences Methodology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0788-2969
Irene ChecaDepartment of Behavioral Sciences Methodology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1832-0865
Martha Fernández-DazaPsychology Department, Cooperative University of Colombia, Troncal del Caribe S/N, 470002 Santa Marta, Colombia.
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia · COUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the study of flourishing as an indicator of subjective wellbeing. The objective herein was to adapt and study the psychometric properties of Diener's Flourishing Scale (FS) among the Colombian population. Accordingly, a cross-sectional study was conducted with a non-probability sample of 1255 Colombian adults. The scale's structure, invariance by gender, and convergent and concurrent validity were studied from a confirmatory perspective using structural equation models. The confirmatory factor analysis showed excellent fit indicators for the one-dimensional structure (CFI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.039, SRMR = 0.020) as well as for the convergent (CFI = 0.909, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.063) and concurrent (CFI = 0.966, RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.041) validity models. The correlations calculated among flourishing with positive and negative effects (PANAS), satisfaction with life (SWL), and optimism and pessimism (LOT) were statistically significant and as expected. Configural, metric, and scalar invariance across gender was confirmed. Percentiles were provided for the total score. The FS scale was a valid and reliable measure to assess high levels of wellbeing among the Colombian population.

Indexed as

ColombiaCross-Sectional StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesColombian populationconfirmatory factor analysisflourishing scalehealthmeasurement invariancepsychological assessmentpsychometric propertiesquality of lifestructural equation modelingwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID33800910
PMCPMC7967402
OpenAlexW3133834586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.