Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33800790›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Cost-Effective Inertial Measurement System for Tracking Movement and Triggering Kinesthetic Feedback in Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users.

McNiel-Inyani Keri, Ahmed W Shehata, Paul D Marasco, Jacqueline S Hebert, Albert H Vette

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

McNiel-Inyani KeriDonadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, 9211 116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada.
Ahmed W ShehataDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 5005 Katz Group Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8442-9901
Paul D MarascoLaboratory for Bionic Integration, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, ND20, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Jacqueline S HebertDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 5005 Katz Group Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0788-0568
Albert H VetteDonadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, 9211 116 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada.
Alberta Health Services · CAUniversity of Alberta · CACleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2014-04666U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH-15-1-0575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in lower-limb prosthetic technologies have facilitated the restoration of ambulation; however, users of such technologies still experience reduced balance control, also due to the absence of proprioceptive feedback. Recent efforts have demonstrated the ability to restore kinesthetic feedback in upper-limb prosthesis applications; however, technical solutions to trigger the required muscle vibration and provide automated feedback have not been explored for lower-limb prostheses. The study's first objective was therefore to develop a feedback system capable of tracking lower-limb movement and automatically triggering a muscle vibrator to induce the kinesthetic illusion. The second objective was to investigate the developed system's ability to provide kinesthetic feedback in a case participant. A low-cost, wireless feedback system, incorporating two inertial measurement units to trigger a muscle vibrator, was developed and tested in an individual with limb loss above the knee. Our system had a maximum communication delay of 50 ms and showed good tracking of Gaussian and sinusoidal movement profiles for velocities below 180 degrees per second (error < 8 degrees), mimicking stepping and walking, respectively. We demonstrated in the case participant that the developed feedback system can successfully elicit the kinesthetic illusion. Our work contributes to the integration of sensory feedback in lower-limb prostheses, to increase their use and functionality.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsCost-Benefit AnalysisFeedbackHumansKinesthesisMovementdevice developmentkinematic feedbackkinesthetic feedbackkinesthetic illusionlower-limb prosthesessensory feedbackwearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID33800790
PMCPMC7961441
OpenAlexW3135521100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.