Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33800789›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2021

Phenol-Rich Food Acceptability: The Influence of Variations in Sweetness Optima and Sensory-Liking Patterns.

Sara Spinelli, John Prescott, Lapo Pierguidi, Caterina Dinnella, Elena Arena, Ada Braghieri, Rossella Di Monaco, Tullia Gallina Toschi, Isabella Endrizzi, Cristina Proserpio and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sara SpinelliDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Donizetti 6, 50144 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5175-6276
John PrescottDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Donizetti 6, 50144 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-9114
Lapo PierguidiDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Donizetti 6, 50144 Florence, Italy.
Caterina DinnellaDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Donizetti 6, 50144 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5765-6057
Elena ArenaDipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente (Di3A), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3419-1875
Ada BraghieriSchool of Agricultural, Forest, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9824-0579
Rossella Di MonacoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4402-4023
Tullia Gallina ToschiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7241-2280
Isabella EndrizziDepartment of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), Via E. Mach 1, 38010 San Michele all'Adige, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0049-4306
Cristina ProserpioDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1793-9113
Luisa TorriUniversity of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele II, 9, 12042 Pollenzo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4522-6452
Erminio MonteleoneDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Donizetti 6, 50144 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9149-969X

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 20158YJW3W
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consumption of phenol-rich foods is limited by their prominent bitterness and astringency. This issue has been addressed by adding sweet tastes, which suppress bitterness, but this is not a complete solution since individuals also differ in their preference for sweetness. In this study, we aimed at identifying groups of consumers differing in sweetness optima and sensory-liking patterns. To this end, increasing concentrations of sucrose were added to a chocolate pudding base. This allowed us to (1) investigate if individual differences in sensory responses are associated with different sweet liking optima in a product context, (2) define the psychological and oro-sensory profile of sweet liker phenotypes derived using a product context, and (3) assess if individuals differing in sweet liking optima differ also in consumption and liking of phenol-rich foods and beverages as a function of their sensory properties (e.g., sweeter vs. more bitter and astringent products). Individuals (1208; 58.4% women, 18-69 years) were characterised for demographics, responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), personality traits and attitudes toward foods. Three clusters were identified based on correlations between sensory responses (sweetness, bitterness and astringency) and liking of the samples: liking was positively related to sweetness and negatively to bitterness and astringency in High and Moderate Sweet Likers, and the opposite in Inverted U-Shaped. Differences between clusters were found in age, gender and personality. Furthermore, the Inverted-U Shaped cluster was found to have overall healthier food behaviours and preferences, with higher liking and consumption of phenol-rich vegetables and beverages without added sugar. These findings point out the importance of identifying the individual sensory-liking patterns in order to develop more effective strategies to promote the acceptability of healthy phenol-rich foods.

Indexed as

PhenolAdolescentAdultAgedCluster AnalysisFemaleFood, FortifiedFood PreferencesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonalityPropylthiouracilSweetening AgentsTaste ThresholdYoung AdultPhenolPropylthiouracilSweetening Agentsindividual differencespersonality traitsphenol-rich foodsPROPsensory-liking patternssweet liking

Identifiers

PMID33800789
PMCPMC7998421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.