ArticleBrain sciences2021
The Graph of Our Mind.
Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Neural Field Continuum Limits and the Structure-Function Partitioning of Cognitive-Emotional Brain Networks.Biology · 2023Review
- Introducing and applying Newtonian blurring: an augmented dataset of 126,000 human connectomes at braingraph.org.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Identifying super-feminine, super-masculine and sex-defining connections in the human braingraph.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Article
- The braingraph.org database with more than 1000 robust human connectomes in five resolutions.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Article
- Good neighbors, bad neighbors: the frequent network neighborhood mapping of the hippocampus enlightens several structural factors of the human intelligence on a 414-subject cohort.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The frequent subgraphs of the connectome of the human brain.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2019Article
- Comparing advanced graph-theoretical parameters of the connectomes of the lobes of the human brain.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2018Article
- The braingraph.org database of high resolution structural connectomes and the brain graph tools.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graph theory in the last two decades penetrated sociology, molecular biology, genetics, chemistry, computer engineering, and numerous other fields of science. One of the more recent areas of its applications is the study of the connections of the human brain. By the development of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (diffusion MRI), it is possible today to map the connections between the 1-1.5 cm2 regions of the gray matter of the human brain. These connections can be viewed as a graph. We have computed 1015-vertex graphs with thousands of edges for hundreds of human brains from one of the highest quality data sources: the Human Connectome Project. Here we analyze the male and female braingraphs graph-theoretically and show statistically significant differences in numerous parameters between the sexes: the female braingraphs are better expanders, have more edges, larger bipartition widths, and larger vertex cover than the braingraphs of the male subjects. These parameters are closely related to the quality measures of highly parallel computer interconnection networks: the better expanding property, the large bipartition width, and the large vertex cover characterize high-quality interconnection networks. We apply the data of 426 subjects and demonstrate the statistically significant (corrected) differences in 116 graph parameters between the sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.