Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33800515›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

The Development of an Abattoir-Based Surveillance System in Lao PDR for the Detection of Zoonoses in Large Ruminants: Q Fever and Brucellosis Seroepidemiology as a Pilot Study.

Jarunee Siengsanan-Lamont, Bounlom Douangngeun, Watthana Theppangna, Syseng Khounsy, Phouvong Phommachanh, Paul W Selleck, Nina Matsumoto, Laurence J Gleeson, Stuart D Blacksell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sero-Epidemiology ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Jarunee Siengsanan-LamontMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Bounlom DouangngeunNational Animal Health Laboratory, Department of Livestock and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Vientiane 0102, Laos.
Watthana TheppangnaNational Animal Health Laboratory, Department of Livestock and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Vientiane 0102, Laos.
Syseng KhounsyNational Animal Health Laboratory, Department of Livestock and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Vientiane 0102, Laos.
Phouvong PhommachanhNational Animal Health Laboratory, Department of Livestock and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Vientiane 0102, Laos.
Paul W SelleckMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Nina MatsumotoSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Camden 2570, Australia.
Laurence J GleesonMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2356-7192
Stuart D BlacksellMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6576-726X
Mahidol University · THMinistry of Agriculture and Forestry · LAThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Defense Threat Reduction Agency HDTRA1-08-D-0007Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although animal health surveillance programmes are useful for gaining information to help improve global health and food security, these programmes can be challenging to establish in developing economies with a low-resource base. This study focused on establishing a national surveillance system initiated by the Lao PDR government using a passive surveillance system of abattoir samples as a pilot model, and to gain information on contagious zoonoses, particularly Q fever and brucellosis, in the large ruminant population. A total of 683 cattle and buffalo samples were collected from six selected provinces of Lao PDR between March-December 2019. Out of 271 samples tested, six samples (2.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.0, 4.8) were positive in the Q fever antibody ELISA test. Only one sample (out of 683; 0.2%, 95% CI 0.0, 0.8) tested positive to the Brucella antibody ELISA test. Seroprevalence of these important zoonoses in Lao PDR were relatively low in cattle and buffaloes; however, extensive animal movement within the country was identified which could increase risks of spreading transboundary diseases. The study highlights the importance of ongoing animal health surveillance and the need to find cost-effective approaches for its long-term sustainability.

Indexed as

BrucellaLao PDRlarge ruminantsQ feverseroprevalencezoonosis

Identifiers

PMID33800515
PMCPMC8001590
OpenAlexW3135502566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.