Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33800489›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2021

Persistence of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Depends on the Analytical Kit: A Report for Up to 10 Months after Infection.

Julien Favresse, Christine Eucher, Marc Elsen, Constant Gillot, Sandrine Van Eeckhoudt, Jean-Michel Dogné, Jonathan Douxfils

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The durability of natural infection and vaccine-induced immunity against future infection by SARS-CoV-2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and Blood Safety: An Updated Review.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Dynamics of infection-elicited SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in children over time.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julien FavresseDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, 5004 Namur, Belgium.
Christine EucherDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, 5004 Namur, Belgium.
Marc ElsenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, 5004 Namur, Belgium.
Constant GillotDepartment of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, University of Namur, 5000 Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4151-9760
Sandrine Van EeckhoudtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clinique St-Luc Bouge, 5004 Namur, Belgium.
Jean-Michel DognéDepartment of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, University of Namur, 5000 Namur, Belgium.
Jonathan DouxfilsDepartment of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, University of Namur, 5000 Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7644-5298
University of Namur · BEClinique Saint-Joseph · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have described the long-term kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies but long-term follow-up data, i.e., >6 months, are still sparse. Additionally, the literature is inconsistent regarding the waning effect of the serological response. The aim of this study was to explore the temporal dynamic changes of the immune response after SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalized and non-hospitalized symptomatic patients over a period of 10 months. Six different analytical kits for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection were used. Positivity rates, inter-assay agreement and kinetic models were determined. A high inter-individual and an inter-methodology variability was observed. Assays targeting total antibodies presented higher positivity rates and reached the highest positivity rates sooner compared with assays directed against IgG. The inter-assay agreement was also higher between these assays. The stratification by disease severity showed a much-elevated serological response in hospitalized versus non-hospitalized patients in all assays. In this 10-month follow-up study, serological assays showed a clinically significant difference to detect past SARS-CoV-2 infection with total antibody assays presenting the highest positivity rates. The waning effect reported in several studies should be interpreted with caution because it could depend on the assay considered.

Indexed as

antibodyCOVID-19kineticslong-termSARS-CoV-2waning effect

Identifiers

PMID33800489
PMCPMC8001517
OpenAlexW3134880623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.