ArticleCancers2021
Transitioning the Molecular Tumor Board from Proof of Concept to Clinical Routine: A German Single-Center Analysis.
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Tumor Boards clinical impact on patient care and structural features: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Molecular Tumor Boards in Malignant Melanoma: Uncovering Challenges and Opportunities in a Bicenter Retrospective Analysis in Germany.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- From Recommendation to Implementation: Clinical Outcomes of a Single-Center Molecular Tumor Board.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
- Optimizing Precision Oncology: Structural Frameworks for Local MTB Integration and Outcome Assessment.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Saturation mutagenesis identifies activating and resistance-inducing FGFR kinase domain mutations.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Large language model processing capabilities of ChatGPT 4.0 to generate molecular tumor board recommendations-a critical evaluation on real world data.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of molecular tumor board data on clinical effectiveness and evaluation gaps.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Empowering personalized oncology: evolution of digital support and visualization tools for molecular tumor boards.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Digital Evolution of Molecular Tumor Boards.Targeted oncology · 2025Review
- The initiation of the second-step intradisciplinary tumor board discussion and its impact on treatment decision. Retrospective data analysis of 12 years' experience in a tertiary oncology center.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Identification and validation of serum MUC17 as a non-invasive early warning biomarker for screening of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia.Translational oncology · 2025Article
- Precision Oncology in Older Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Experience.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Comprehensive genetic profiling and molecularly guided treatment for patients with primary CNS tumors.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- [The collaborative project "Personalized medicine for oncology" (PM4Onco) as part of the Medical Informatics Initiative (MII)].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Article
- [Precision oncology and molecular tumor boards].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- [Precision medicine in oncology].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Article
- Extending cBioPortal for Therapy Recommendation Documentation in Molecular Tumor Boards: Development and Usability Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Article
- Ibero-American Consensus Review and Incorporation of New Biomarkers for Clinical Practice in Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular precision oncology faces two major challenges: first, to identify relevant and actionable molecular variants in a rapidly changing field and second, to provide access to a broad patient population. Here, we report a four-year experience of the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg (Germany) including workflows and process optimizations. This retrospective single-center study includes data on 488 patients enrolled in the MTB from February 2015 through December 2018. Recommendations include individual molecular diagnostics, molecular stratified therapies, assessment of treatment adherence and patient outcomes including overall survival. The majority of MTB patients presented with stage IV oncologic malignancies (90.6%) and underwent an average of 2.1 previous lines of therapy. Individual diagnostic recommendations were given to 487 patients (99.8%). A treatment recommendation was given in 264 of all cases (54.1%) which included a molecularly matched treatment in 212 patients (43.4%). The 264 treatment recommendations were implemented in 76 patients (28.8%). Stable disease was observed in 19 patients (25.0%), 17 had partial response (22.4%) and five showed a complete remission (6.6%). An objective response was achieved in 28.9% of cases with implemented recommendations and for 4.5% of the total population (22 of 488 patients). By optimizing the MTB workflow, case-discussions per session increased significantly while treatment adherence and outcome remained stable over time. Our data demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of molecular-guided personalized therapy for cancer patients in a clinical routine setting showing a low but robust and durable disease control rate over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.