Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33800307›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Nurse Motivation, Engagement and Well-Being before an Electronic Medical Record System Implementation: A Mixed Methods Study.

Rebecca M Jedwab, Alison M Hutchinson, Elizabeth Manias, Rafael A Calvo, Naomi Dobroff, Nicholas Glozier, Bernice Redley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca M JedwabMonash Medical Centre Clayton, Monash Health Digital Health Division, Nursing and Midwifery Informatics, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3014-8797
Alison M HutchinsonCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research-Monash Health Partnership, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.
Elizabeth ManiasFaculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne Burwood Campus, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3747-0087
Rafael A CalvoDyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2DB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2238-0684
Naomi DobroffMonash Medical Centre Clayton, Monash Health Digital Health Division, Nursing and Midwifery Informatics, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.
Nicholas GlozierCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Bernice RedleyCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research-Monash Health Partnership, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2376-3989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) is a significant workplace event for nurses in hospitals. Understanding nurses' key concerns can inform EMR implementation and ongoing optimisation strategies to increase the likelihood of nurses remaining in the nursing workforce. This concurrent mixed-methods study included surveys from 540 nurses (response rate 15.5%), and interviews with 63 nurses to examine their perceptions of using a new EMR prior to implementation at a single healthcare organisation. Survey findings revealed 32.2% (

Indexed as

MotivationNursing Staff, HospitalElectronic Health RecordsHumansJob SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceburnoutelectronic medical recordhealth communicationmotivationnursingnursing workforcewell-beingwork engagement

Identifiers

PMID33800307
PMCPMC7967448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.