Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33800185›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders.

Roger Alonso-Royo, Carmen María Sánchez-Torrelo, Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera, Noelia Zagalaz-Anula, Yolanda Castellote-Caballero, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Daniel Rodríguez-Almagro, Rafael Lomas-Vega

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07371143 (Turkish Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07371143 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Turkish Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index

TypeobservationalSponsorSevgi Medical CenterRan2026 to 2026Enrolled48ConditionsTemporomandibular Disorder (TMD)ArmsTurkish Version of Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index and Accompanying Scales
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roger Alonso-RoyoFisioMedic Clinic, Dos Hermanas, 41701 Sevilla, Spain.
Carmen María Sánchez-TorreloFisioMedic Clinic, Dos Hermanas, 41701 Sevilla, Spain.
Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-VeraDepartment of Health Sciences, Campus las Lagunillas, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9103-9696
Noelia Zagalaz-AnulaDepartment of Health Sciences, Campus las Lagunillas, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7105-9865
Yolanda Castellote-CaballeroDepartment of Health Sciences, Campus las Lagunillas, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6233-6787
Esteban Obrero-GaitánDepartment of Health Sciences, Campus las Lagunillas, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8430-5500
Daniel Rodríguez-AlmagroDepartment of Health Sciences, Campus las Lagunillas, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-1091
Rafael Lomas-VegaDepartment of Health Sciences, Campus las Lagunillas, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2546-6301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index (HCDI) is a simple and quick test used to evaluate subjects affected by temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and its psychometric properties have not been tested. The test evaluates movement, joint function, pain and musculature, providing a quick general overview that could be very useful at different levels of care. For this reason, the aim of this study was to validate the use of the HCDI in a sample of patients with TMD.

methodsThe sample consisted of 107 subjects, 60 TMD patients and 47 healthy controls. The study evaluated concurrent validity, inter-rater concordance and predictive values.

resultsThe HCDI showed moderate to substantial inter-rater concordance among the items and excellent concordance for the total scores. The correlation with other TMD assessment tests was high, the correlation with dizziness was moderate and the correlation with neck pain, headache and overall quality of life was poor. The prediction of TMD showed a sensitivity of 86.67%, a specificity of 68.09% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.841.

conclusionsThe HCDI is a valid and reliable assessment instrument; its clinimetric properties are adequate, and it has a good ability to discriminate between TMD-affected and TMD-unaffected subjects.

Indexed as

questionnaires and survey validity studytemporomandibular disordervalidity and reliability

Identifiers

PMID33800185
PMCPMC8000811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.