Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33800094›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Effects of a Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Severe Post-COVID-19 Patients.

Marc Spielmanns, Anna-Maria Pekacka-Egli, Sabine Schoendorf, Wolfram Windisch, Matthias Hermann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05813873 (The Use of Incentive Spirometry), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05813873 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Incentive Spirometry (Triflow) in Patients With Long Covid

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean University CyprusRan2022 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsLong COVIDArmsTriflow, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effect of Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Pulmonary Fibrosis.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc SpielmannsPulmonary Medicine and Sleep Medicine Center, Zurich RehaCenter Klinik Wald, CH-8636 Wald, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4541-6977
Anna-Maria Pekacka-EgliPulmonary Medicine and Sleep Medicine Center, Zurich RehaCenter Klinik Wald, CH-8636 Wald, Switzerland.
Sabine SchoendorfPulmonary Medicine and Sleep Medicine Center, Zurich RehaCenter Klinik Wald, CH-8636 Wald, Switzerland.
Wolfram WindischDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Faculty of Health, University Witten-Herdecke, D-58455 Witten, Germany.
Matthias HermannDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart Centre, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHZürcher RehaZentrum Davos · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere COVID-19 infection often leads to impairments requiring pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) following the acute phase. Little is known about the efficacy of PR in these patients. We therefore compared post-COVID-19 patients (PG) referred to PR patients with other lung diseases (LG).

methods99 PG were admitted to PR. In a prospective design, the results of PG were collected and compared to the results of LG of 2019 (

resultsAccording to age, sex, and CIRS, both groups showed no significant differences. The improvements in the 6-MWT in the pre to post comparison were on average 180 (±101) meters for PG and 102 (±89) meters for LG (

conclusionsComprehensive PR in PG is very effective according to the results in FIM, 6-MWT and FT. Therefore, we recommend PR following severe post-COVID-19 infections.

Indexed as

COVID-19Lung DiseasesHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeWalk Test6-MWTCIRSCOVID-19FIMFTpulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID33800094
PMCPMC7967422
OpenAlexW3135549879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.