Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33799601›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Assessment of Naturally Sourced Mineral Clays for the 3D Printing of Biopolymer-Based Nanocomposite Inks.

Rebeca Leu Alexa, Horia Iovu, Bogdan Trica, Catalin Zaharia, Andrada Serafim, Elvira Alexandrescu, Ionut-Cristian Radu, George Vlasceanu, Silviu Preda, Claudia Mihaela Ninciuleanu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of New Collagen/Clay Composite Biomaterials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rebeca Leu AlexaAdvanced Polymer Materials Group, Department of Bioresources and Polymer Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-6365
Horia IovuAdvanced Polymer Materials Group, Department of Bioresources and Polymer Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan TricaNational R-D Institute for Chemistry and Petrochemistry ICECHIM-Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 202, 6th District, P.O. Box 35/174, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9948-6914
Catalin ZahariaAdvanced Polymer Materials Group, Department of Bioresources and Polymer Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7522-467X
Andrada SerafimAdvanced Polymer Materials Group, Department of Bioresources and Polymer Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.
Elvira AlexandrescuNational R-D Institute for Chemistry and Petrochemistry ICECHIM-Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 202, 6th District, P.O. Box 35/174, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5378-692X
Ionut-Cristian RaduAdvanced Polymer Materials Group, Department of Bioresources and Polymer Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.
George VlasceanuFaculty of Medical Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Gheorghe Polizu 1-7, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9876-6180
Silviu PredaInstitute of Physical Chemistry "Ilie Murgulescu", Romanian Academy, Splaiul Independentei 202, 6th District, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3956-3313
Claudia Mihaela NinciuleanuNational R-D Institute for Chemistry and Petrochemistry ICECHIM-Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 202, 6th District, P.O. Box 35/174, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.
Raluca IanchisNational R-D Institute for Chemistry and Petrochemistry ICECHIM-Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 202, 6th District, P.O. Box 35/174, 060021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5540-2774

Funding

Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-4216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated the possibility of obtaining 3D printed composite constructs using biomaterial-based nanocomposite inks. The biopolymeric matrix consisted of methacrylated gelatin (GelMA). Several types of nanoclay were added as the inorganic component. Our aim was to investigate the influence of clay type on the rheological behavior of ink formulations and to determine the morphological and structural properties of the resulting crosslinked hydrogel-based nanomaterials. Moreover, through the inclusion of nanoclays, our goal was to improve the printability and shape fidelity of nanocomposite scaffolds. The viscosity of all ink formulations was greater in the presence of inorganic nanoparticles as shear thinning occurred with increased shear rate. Hydrogel nanocomposites presented predominantly elastic rather than viscous behavior as the materials were crosslinked which led to improved mechanical properties. The inclusion of nanoclays in the biopolymeric matrix limited hydrogel swelling due the physical barrier effect but also because of the supplementary crosslinks induced by the clay layers. The distribution of inorganic filler within the GelMA-based hydrogels led to higher porosities as a consequence of their interaction with the biopolymeric ink. The present study could be useful for the development of soft nanomaterials foreseen for the additive manufacturing of customized implants for tissue engineering.

Indexed as

3D printingbiopolymerhydrogelinksnanoclaynanocomposites

Identifiers

PMID33799601
PMCPMC8001953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.