Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33799584›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Colposcopic Impression Has a Key Role in the Estimation of the Risk of HSIL/CIN3.

Marta Del Pino, Martina Aida Angeles, Cristina Martí, Carla Henere, Meritxell Munmany, Lorena Marimon, Adela Saco, Natalia Rakislova, Jaume Ordi, Aureli Torné

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Risk Profile of High-grade Cervical Lesions and Cervical Cancer Considering the Combination of Cytology, HPV Genotype, and Age among Women Undergoing Colposcopy.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta Del PinoInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-2403
Martina Aida AngelesDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Cristina MartíInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Carla HenereInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Meritxell MunmanyInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Lorena MarimonDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Adela SacoDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Natalia RakislovaISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume OrdiDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4820-7954
Aureli TornéInstitute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4700-9507
Universitat de Barcelona · ESBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESInstitut Claudius Regaud · FR

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ICSIII)-Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria and ERDF 'One Way to Europe' PI17/00772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently published guidelines stratify the risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL/CIN3) based on hrHPV detection and Pap smear results. However, colposcopic impression could also provide valuable information for risk estimation. We aimed to analyze the value of adding colposcopic impression to screening tests for the diagnosis of HSIL/CIN3 in 302 women referred for colposcopy due to an abnormal Pap smear. All women underwent hrHPV detection and genotyping (HPV 16/18 vs. non-16/18 hrHPV), Pap smear, and colposcopy with at least one biopsy. HSIL Pap smear, HPV 16/18, and grade 2 colposcopy findings increased the risk of HSIL/CIN3 in the univariate analysis but only colposcopy retained significance in the multivariate model. At least 30% of the women with grade 2 colposcopy findings had HSIL/CIN3, independent of the screening test results. Among women with an HSIL Pap smear and grade 2 colposcopy findings, 53.3% had HSIL/CIN3 independently of the hrHPV genotype. Contrarily, the prevalence of HSIL/CIN3 in women with <HSIL Pap smear, non-HPV 16/18 infection, and normal colposcopy or with grade 1 findings was 2.9% and 8.1%, respectively. In conclusion, colposcopy impression provides essential information to identify women at risk of HSIL/CIN3.

Indexed as

colposcopyHSIL/CIN3risk-based management

Identifiers

PMID33799584
PMCPMC7999816
OpenAlexW3135003705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.