Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33799475›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Daan Linders, Marion Deken, Maxime van der Valk, Willemieke Tummers, Shadhvi Bhairosingh, Dennis Schaap, Gesina van Lijnschoten, Elham Zonoobi, Peter Kuppen, Cornelis van de Velde and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intraoperative molecular imaging of colorectal lung metastases with SGM-101: a feasibility study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daan LindersDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marion DekenDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maxime van der ValkDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Willemieke TummersDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1513-7037
Shadhvi BhairosinghDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dennis SchaapDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Gesina van LijnschotenLaboratory of Pathology, Stichting Pathology and Medical Microbiology, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Elham ZonoobiEdinburgh Molecular Imaging Ltd., Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK.
Peter KuppenDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0294-3251
Cornelis van de VeldeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alexander VahrmeijerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arantza Farina SarasquetaDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cornelis SierDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4337-2758
Denise HillingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5875-6164
Leiden University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions H2020-MSCA-ITN-2019H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions H2020-MSCA-RISE-2019KWF Kankerbestrijding UL2015-7966KWF Kankerbestrijding UL2015-8089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal cancer patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy can be monitored with a watch-and-wait strategy. However, regrowth rates indicate that identification of patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) remains challenging. Targeted near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy is a potential tool to improve response evaluation. Promising tumor targets include carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), integrin αvβ6, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR). To investigate the applicability of these targets, we analyzed protein expression by immunohistochemistry and quantified these by a total immunostaining score (TIS) in tissue of rectal cancer patients with a pCR. CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6, and uPAR expression in the diagnostic biopsy was high (TIS > 6) in, respectively, 100%, 100%, 33%, and 46% of cases. CEA and EpCAM expressions were significantly higher in the diagnostic biopsy compared with the corresponding tumor bed (

Indexed as

CEAcomplete responseEpCAMfluorescence imagingpreoperative chemo and radiotherapyrectal cancerresponse evaluationtumor targeteduPARαvβ6

Identifiers

PMID33799475
PMCPMC8002064
OpenAlexW3135948644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.