Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33799353›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

The Impact of Modern Technologies on Molecular Diagnostic Success Rates, with a Focus on Inherited Retinal Dystrophy and Hearing Loss.

Suzanne E de Bruijn, Zeinab Fadaie, Frans P M Cremers, Hannie Kremer, Susanne Roosing

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inherited Retinal Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suzanne E de BruijnDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2912-9265
Zeinab FadaieDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0440-3846
Frans P M CremersDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4954-5592
Hannie KremerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0841-8693
Susanne RoosingDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9038-0067

Funding

Algemene Nederlandse Vereniging ter voorkoming van Blindheid 2017-017, 2018-013DCMN Radboudumc grant DCMN RadboudumcFoundation Fighting Blindness PPA-0517-0717-RADLandelijke Stichting voor Blinden en Slechtzienden 2017-017, 2018-013Oogfonds 2017-017, 2018-013Rotterdamse Stichting Blindenbelangen 2017-017, 2018-013Stichting Blindenhulp 2017-017, 2018-013Stichting Blinden-Penning 2017-017, 2018-013Stichting tot Verbetering van het Lot der Blinden 2017-017, 2018-013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of pathogenic variants in monogenic diseases has been of interest to researchers and clinicians for several decades. However, for inherited diseases with extremely high genetic heterogeneity, such as hearing loss and retinal dystrophies, establishing a molecular diagnosis requires an enormous effort. In this review, we use these two genetic conditions as examples to describe the initial molecular genetic identification approaches, as performed since the early 90s, and subsequent improvements and refinements introduced over the years. Next, the history of DNA sequencing from conventional Sanger sequencing to high-throughput massive parallel sequencing, a.k.a. next-generation sequencing, is outlined, including their advantages and limitations and their impact on identifying the remaining genetic defects. Moreover, the development of recent technologies, also coined "third-generation" sequencing, is reviewed, which holds the promise to overcome these limitations. Furthermore, we outline the importance and complexity of variant interpretation in clinical diagnostic settings concerning the massive number of different variants identified by these methods. Finally, we briefly mention the development of novel approaches such as optical mapping and multiomics, which can help to further identify genetic defects in the near future.

Indexed as

Pathology, MolecularEye ProteinsGenetic HeterogeneityHearing LossHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationRetinal DystrophiesEye Proteinsdiagnostic yieldgenetic diagnosticsinherited hearing lossinherited retinal dystrophiesnext-generation sequencingthird-generation sequencingvariant interpretation

Identifiers

PMID33799353
PMCPMC7998853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.