Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33799289›Full record

ArticleEpidemics2021

Modelling the early phase of the Belgian COVID-19 epidemic using a stochastic compartmental model and studying its implied future trajectories.

Steven Abrams, James Wambua, Eva Santermans, Lander Willem, Elise Kuylen, Pietro Coletti, Pieter Libin, Christel Faes, Oana Petrof, Sereina A Herzog and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven AbramsData Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium; Global Health Institute, Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. Electronic address: steven.abrams@uhasselt.be.
James WambuaData Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Eva SantermansData Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Lander WillemCentre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Elise KuylenCentre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Pietro ColettiData Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Pieter LibinData Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium; Artificial Intelligence Lab, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Clinical and Epidemiological Virology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Christel FaesData Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Oana PetrofData Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Sereina A HerzogCentre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Philippe BeutelsCentre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Niel HensData Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium; Centre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEHasselt University · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the onset of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic throughout the world, a large fraction of the global population is or has been under strict measures of physical distancing and quarantine, with many countries being in partial or full lockdown. These measures are imposed in order to reduce the spread of the disease and to lift the pressure on healthcare systems. Estimating the impact of such interventions as well as monitoring the gradual relaxing of these stringent measures is quintessential to understand how resurgence of the COVID-19 epidemic can be controlled for in the future. In this paper we use a stochastic age-structured discrete time compartmental model to describe the transmission of COVID-19 in Belgium. Our model explicitly accounts for age-structure by integrating data on social contacts to (i) assess the impact of the lockdown as implemented on March 13, 2020 on the number of new hospitalizations in Belgium; (ii) conduct a scenario analysis estimating the impact of possible exit strategies on potential future COVID-19 waves. More specifically, the aforementioned model is fitted to hospital admission data, data on the daily number of COVID-19 deaths and serial serological survey data informing the (sero)prevalence of the disease in the population while relying on a Bayesian MCMC approach. Our age-structured stochastic model describes the observed outbreak data well, both in terms of hospitalizations as well as COVID-19 related deaths in the Belgian population. Despite an extensive exploration of various projections for the future course of the epidemic, based on the impact of adherence to measures of physical distancing and a potential increase in contacts as a result of the relaxation of the stringent lockdown measures, a lot of uncertainty remains about the evolution of the epidemic in the next months.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBayes TheoremBelgiumCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19ForecastingHospitalizationHumansSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesAge-structured compartmental SEIR modelHospitalization and mortality dataMarkov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)Serial serological surveyStochastic chain-binomial model

Identifiers

PMID33799289
PMCPMC7986325
OpenAlexW3137450985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.