Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33799233›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2021

Is weight-based IV dosing of trastuzumab preferable to SC fixed-dose in some patients? A systematic scoping review.

Hans-Christian Kolberg, Christian Jackisch, Sara A Hurvitz, Julie Winstone, Helen Barham, Vladimir Hanes, Delphine Courmier

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hans-Christian KolbergDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Center, Marienhospital, Josef-Albers-Str. 70, 46236, Bottrop, Germany. Electronic address: hans-christian.kolberg@mhb-bottrop.de.
Christian JackischDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Center, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, D-63069, Offenbach, Germany. Electronic address: Christian.Jackisch@sana.de.
Sara A HurvitzDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: SHurvitz@mednet.ucla.edu.
Julie WinstonePerscribo Medical Communications Ltd, 7 York Close, Kempshott Rise, Basingstoke, RG22 4PU, UK. Electronic address: jwinstone@perscribo.co.uk.
Helen BarhamPerscribo Medical Communications Ltd, 7 York Close, Kempshott Rise, Basingstoke, RG22 4PU, UK.
Vladimir HanesAmgen Biosimilar Business Unit, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320USA, USA. Electronic address: vhanes@amgen.com.
Delphine CourmierAmgen Global Health Economics, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320USA, USA. Electronic address: dcourmie@amgen.com.
Amgen (United States) · USMarienhospital Bottrop · DEMedical Research Institute · LKSana Klinikum Offenbach · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trastuzumab, a key treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, is available in weight-based IV and fixed-dose (600 mg) SC formulations. While the Phase 3 HannaH trial indicated non-inferiority of the SC formulation, there is some concern that the target plasma concentration may not be reached in overweight/obese patients whereas low-body-weight patients may be at risk of toxicity. This scoping review evaluated whether overweight/obese patients are at risk of below-target exposure with fixed-dose SC trastuzumab, whether low-body-weight patients are at risk of increased toxicity, especially cardiotoxicity, and whether IV and SC trastuzumab are equivalent in terms of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (e.g. infections). Thirty-seven publications that met the eligibility criteria were included. Body weight is not an important determinant of exposure to trastuzumab at steady state (i.e. pre-dose cycle 8); however, real-world evidence suggests that the target concentration (20 μg/mL) may not be reached with the first SC dose in overweight/obese patients. There is no evidence that low-body-weight patients are at increased risk of cardiotoxicity with SC trastuzumab, although this may be confounded by the higher rate of cardiovascular comorbidities in overweight patients. In Phase 3 trials, SC trastuzumab was associated with higher rates of ISRs, ADAs and SAEs, the latter often requiring hospitalization and occurring during adjuvant treatment when patients are not burdened by chemotherapy. The route of administration of trastuzumab (IV vs SC) in different treatment settings should be discussed with the patient, taking into account the risks and benefits associated with each route.

Indexed as

Body WeightAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousInfusions, SubcutaneousInjections, SubcutaneousTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumabBody weightBreast cancerFixed-dosePharmacokineticsSubcutaneousTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID33799233
PMCPMC8044716
OpenAlexW3137402202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.