ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2021
3D printed sample tubes for solid-state NMR experiments.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D-Printed Device for Efficient Packing of Semisolid Samples in 3.2-mm Rotors Used in Cryoprobe Systems.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2025Article
- 3D-printed microcell for protein NMR at high ionic strengths and small sample volumes.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2025Article
- 3D-Printable centrifugal devices for biomolecular solid state NMR rotors.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2023Article
- One-Shot Resin 3D-Printed Stators for Low-Cost Fabrication of Magic-Angle Spinning NMR Probeheads.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- A 3D Printer in the Lab: Not Only a Toy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Additive fabrication for NMR probe builders.Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The availability of 3D printers and an assortment of polymers that can be fashioned into a wide variety of shapes provides opportunities to rethink the design and construction of probes for NMR spectroscopy. The direct interfacing of computer aided design (CAD) with precise 3D printing enables the simplification and optimization of probes through the rapid production of components. Here we demonstrate the use of 3D printing to fully integrate a permanent former for the radiofrequency (RF) coil with the sample chamber (equivalent to the sample tube). This simultaneously increases the sample volume and improves the filling factor within a fixed outer diameter (OD). It also reduces the space lost in dual coil arrangements where a high frequency resonator is positioned outside a solenoid coil tuned to one or more lower frequencies, making multiple-resonance experiments more efficient. The initial applications demonstrate the possibilities for future designs that reimagine the interface between resonators and the liquid, solid, and heterogeneous samples encountered in NMR studies of biomolecules, polymers, surfaces, and spectroscopy (MRS) and imaging (MRI) of biological organs and intact organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.