ArticleContemporary clinical trials2021
The feasibility and acceptability of a web-based physical activity for the heart (PATH) intervention designed to reduce the risk of heart disease among inactive African Americans: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a novel web-based physical activity intervention in adults with overweight/obesity: A pilot randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Trial
- A Decision Tree Analysis on the Impact of a Technology-Based Program on Symptom Distress: Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors.Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN · 2022Trial
- Digital, Social Micro-Interventions to Promote Physical Activity Among Midlife Adults With Elevated Cardiovascular Risk: An Ambulatory Feasibility Study With Momentary Randomization.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024Observational
- Personalization of Intervention Timing for Physical Activity: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany studies have used the internet to promote physical activity (PA) in several settings, including the home environment, but few have been tailored for African Americans (AAs). To address this research gap, we conducted focus groups with AAs to inform the development of a web-based intervention, Physical Activity for The Heart (PATH), that leverages openly accessible platforms, such as YouTube, to promote PA in any setting. PURPOSE: To describe the rationale and design of a pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT), that examines the feasibility and acceptability of the PATH intervention among 30 AA adults aged 40--70 years without history of cardiovascular disease.
methodsA 12-week, single-site, wait-listed RCT with subjects randomized 1:1 to either: 1) treatment group - participants receive the PATH intervention, including the online portal and twice a month phone calls from a PA coach, or 2) attention control group - participants receive a self-help PA handout and twice a month general health newsletter. All participants self-monitor step count using actigraphy. The primary outcomes of this 12-week, pilot RCT are recruitment, retention, and adherence to self-monitoring (Actigraph wear time) and the intervention protocol (PATH utilization). The secondary outcomes include changes in PA (step count, moderate-to-vigorous PA, exercise self-efficacy), and cardiometabolic risk (HbA1C, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, type 2 diabetes risk score, percent body fat, weight, and waist circumference) from baseline to 12 weeks.
conclusionsThis study will provide PATH intervention feasibility and acceptability data among inactive AA adults and will inform a future, full-scale RCT testing efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.